Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460035›Full record

SynthesisPediatric radiology2022

Pediatric chest radiograph interpretation: how far has artificial intelligence come? A systematic literature review.

Sirwa Padash, Mohammad Reza Mohebbian, Scott J Adams, Robert D E Henderson, Paul Babyn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Hidden Threat of Hallucinations in Binary Chest X-ray Pneumonia Classification.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Computer-Aided Lung Auscultation Screening and Radiographic Evaluation of Pediatric Pneumonia.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sirwa PadashDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada. Sirwa.Padash@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1511-7389
Mohammad Reza MohebbianDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Scott J AdamsDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8243-9903
Robert D E HendersonDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2909-5384
Paul BabynDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most artificial intelligence (AI) studies have focused primarily on adult imaging, with less attention to the unique aspects of pediatric imaging. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify all publicly available pediatric datasets and determine their potential utility and limitations for pediatric AI studies and (2) systematically review the literature to assess the current state of AI in pediatric chest radiograph interpretation. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase to retrieve all studies from 1990 to 2021 that assessed AI for pediatric chest radiograph interpretation and abstracted the datasets used to train and test AI algorithms, approaches and performance metrics. Of 29 publicly available chest radiograph datasets, 2 datasets included solely pediatric chest radiographs, and 7 datasets included pediatric and adult patients. We identified 55 articles that implemented an AI model to interpret pediatric chest radiographs or pediatric and adult chest radiographs. Classification of chest radiographs as pneumonia was the most common application of AI, evaluated in 65% of the studies. Although many studies report high diagnostic accuracy, most algorithms were not validated on external datasets. Most AI studies for pediatric chest radiograph interpretation have focused on a limited number of diseases, and progress is hindered by a lack of large-scale pediatric chest radiograph datasets.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePneumoniaAdultAlgorithmsChildHumansRadiography, ThoracicArtificial intelligenceChestDeep learningPediatricPneumoniaRadiography

Identifiers

PMID35460035
PMCPMC9033522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.