Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460001›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Radon exposure and risk of cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis in occupational and general population studies.

Liping Lu, Yijia Zhang, Cheng Chen, Robert William Field, Ka Kahe

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Assessing historical residential radon exposure using a glass-based surface trap method in low radon level areas: a pilot study.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liping Lu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Yijia Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Cheng ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Robert William FieldDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Ka KaheDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA. kk3399@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5078-2010
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is biologically plausible, findings relating radon exposure to the risk of cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) are inconsistent and inconclusive. To investigate whether radon exposure was associated with the risk of CeVD, we qualitatively and quantitatively summarized the literature on radon and CeVD in both occupational and general populations. A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed for peer-reviewed articles published through March 2022. Studies were excluded if radon exposure was not assessed separately from other ionizing radiation. In the meta-analysis, excess relative risks (ERRs) were converted to relative risks (RRs), and the pooled RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using the random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird). In the systematic review, nine eligible studies were summarized. Six occupational studies indicated inconsistent associations between cumulative radon exposure and CeVD mortality among mine workers. With available data from four updated occupational studies (99,730 mine workers and 2745 deaths), the pooled RR of radon exposure with CeVD mortality showed a non-significant association (1.10, 95% CI 0.92, 1.31). Three studies (841,270 individuals and 24,288 events) conducted in general populations consistently demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between residential radon exposure and risk of CeVD. The existing literature suggested a potential link between radon exposure and CeVD risk in general population. The inconsistent association in occupationally exposed populations may be explained by different methods of radon assessment and other methodological issues. Since radon exposure is a common public health issue, more rigorously designed epidemiologic studies, especially in the general population are warranted.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular DisordersLung NeoplasmsOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadonHumansResearch DesignRiskRadonCerebrovascular diseaseGeneral populationMeta-analysisOccupational populationRadonRadon decay productStroke

Identifiers

PMID35460001
PMCPMC9209369
OpenAlexW4224236771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.