ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2022
Clinical experience with an in-NICU magnetic resonance imaging system.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06052865 (Serial Neuroimaging of Brain Injury and Brain Growth in the NICU in the Very Preterm Infant), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Serial Neuroimaging of Brain Injury and Brain Growth in the NICU in the Very Preterm Infant
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain MRI findings in near-term and term infants admitted to a neonatal ward.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Low-field and portable MRI technology: advancements and innovations.European radiology experimental · 2025Review
- Diffusion probabilistic generative models for accelerated, in-NICU permanent magnet neonatal MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Point of care magnetic resonance neonatal neuroimaging applications and early imaging in infants under active therapeutic hypothermia: a perspective.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
- White Matter Injury on Early-versus-Term-Equivalent Age Brain MRI in Infants Born Preterm.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Do we need a brain MRI once or twice in infants treated with hypothermia?Pediatric research · 2023Article
- A 1-Tesla MRI system for dedicated brain imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Serial neuroimaging of brain growth and development in very preterm infants receiving tailored neuropromotive support in the NICU. Protocol for a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the utility of the 1 Tesla (1 T) Embrace (Aspect Imaging) neonatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner in a level III NICU. STUDY
designEmbrace brain MRI findings for 207 infants were reviewed, including 32 scans directly compared within 5 days with imaging on a 3 T Siemens Trio. Clinical MRI scan abnormalities were also compared to cranial ultrasound findings.
resultOf the 207 Embrace brain MRIs, 146 (70.5%) were obtained for clinical indications and 61 (29.5%) were research cases. Abnormal findings were found in 80 scans, most commonly hemorrhage and white matter injury. Notable findings included a stroke, medullary brainstem tumor, and polymicrogyria. In the 1 T versus 3 T comparison cohort, results were discordant in only one infant with punctate foci of susceptibility noted only on the 3 T scan.
conclusionThe Embrace MRI scans detected clinically relevant brain abnormalities and in a subset were clinically comparable to 3 T scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.