ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2022
Combination effect of epsilon-poly-L-lysine and antibiotics against common bacterial pathogens.
Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Injectable ε-Polylysine/Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels with Resistance-Preventing Antibacterial Activity for Treating Wound Infections.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Failure or future? Exploring alternative antibacterials: a comparative analysis of antibiotics and naturally derived biopolymers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Hyperbranched Polylysine Exhibits a Collaborative Enhancement of the Antibiotic Capacity to Kill Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Recent advances in therapeutic targets identification and development of treatment strategies towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.BMC microbiology · 2023Review
- Poly-L-Lysine to Fight Antibiotic Resistances ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epsilon-poly-L-lysine (EPL) is an antimicrobial peptide with low mammalian toxicity; thus, it is commonly used as food preservative. Here, the capacity of EPL to improve the efficacy of the antibiotics ampicillin (AMP), gentamycin (GEN), tetracycline (TCN), and methicillin (MET) against four bacterial pathogens, namely Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43, MET-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MSSA), and MET-resistant S. aureus ATCC 33591 (MRSA), was investigated. Some antibiotic-EPL combinations, i.e., AMP-EPL, GEN-EPL, and TCN-EPL, were particularly active against the pathogens through synergy, partial synergy, or additive effects. Additionally, MET-EPL displayed a partial synergistic effect against MRSA. GEN-EPL had the most powerful antimicrobial effect against MSSA: it eradicated the bacterium within an hour. Conversely, AMP-EPL and MET-EPL were the least potent combinations against MRSA, and TCN-EPL was least potent against K. pneumoniae; for these combinations, bactericidal activities occurred >10 h after initial treatments. All antibiotic-EPL treatments showed inhibitory activities against P. aeruginosa biofilm formation and enhanced preformed biofilm disruption in vitro. Similarly, the inhibition of biofilm formation on a porcine skin model was observed. Moreover, no significant cytotoxicity was detected for any antibiotic-EPL treatment in tests using Balb/3t3 fibroblasts. Given the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria, combining antibiotics with EPL may enhance antibiotic effectiveness, as shown in this study, while helping to avoid antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35459856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.