ArticleBritish dental journal2022
Professionalism in the dental practice: perspectives from members of the public, dentists and dental care professionals.
Article in British dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of psychology and communication skills in orthodontic practice: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Structural Accountability and Practice-Level Governance as Dual Pathways to Accreditation-Seeking Intention in Private Dental Practice: Evidence from a Mixed Public-Private Healthcare System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dentists' perceptions of practicing patient-centred care: a qualitative exploration guided by the theoretical domains framework.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Patient perceptions of dental students' professionalism in undergraduate prosthodontic clinics: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- The experiences of unprofessionalism among students in dental education: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Reconciling duty: a theory and typology of professionalism.BDJ open · 2023Article
- Public Trust in Dentists among Arabic Populations.International journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- The ethical attitude of dentists scale: development and psychometric properties.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This paper examines views on professionalism in the dental practice workplace through a thematic analysis of data from eight focus groups.Methods Focus groups were conducted with 19 dentists, 13 dental care professionals and 19 members of the public in England and Wales. The research was part of a larger mixed-methods study of professionalism in dentistry commissioned by the General Dental Council.Results The four most prominent themes in the focus group data were: communication, the cost of treatment, the role of the dental team and consequences of professionalism concerns. Participants agreed that these are fundamental professionalism issues, although there was some difference of opinion about addressing them. There was disagreement about the responsibilities of different members of the dental team in maintaining professionalism.Conclusion We conclude that communication skills training should be a central part of the professionalism at all levels of training. Education about team working could foster a more collaborative approach to professionalism across the dental team and support good, patient-centred oral healthcare. Support and guidance are required to help professionals reflect and learn from mistakes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.