Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459662›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Psychometric properties of the full and short version Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture (NHSOPSC) instrument: a cross-sectional study assessing patient safety culture in Norwegian homecare services.

Petter Viksveen, Mette Røhne, Lisbet Grut, Kathrine Cappelen, Siri Wiig, Eline Ree

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Translation of the agency for health care research and quality nursing home survey on patient safety for Swedish conditions.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Petter ViksveenSHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway petter.viksveen@uis.no.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-8404
Mette RøhneSINTEF Digital, Health, SINTEF, Oslo, Norway.
Lisbet GrutSINTEF Digital, Health, SINTEF, Oslo, Norway.
Kathrine CappelenCenter for Caring Research South, University of South-Eastern Norway Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Porsgrunn, Norway.
Siri WiigSHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-038X
Eline ReeSHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMeasure patient safety culture in homecare services; test the psychometric properties of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture (NHSOPSC) instrument; and propose a short-version Homecare Services Survey on Patient Safety Culture instrument for use in homecare services.

designCross-sectional survey with psychometric testing.

settingTwenty-seven publicly funded homecare units in eight municipalities (six counties) in Norway.

participantsFive-hundred and forty health personnel working in homecare services.

interventionsNot applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Patient safety culture assessed using the NHSOPSC instrument. Secondary: Overall perception of service users' safety, service safety and overall care.

methodsPsychometric testing of the NHSOPSC instrument using factor analysis and optimal test assembly with generalised partial credit model to develop a short-version instrument proposal.

resultsMost healthcare personnel rated patient safety culture in homecare services positively. A 19-item short-version instrument for assessing patient safety culture had high internal consistency, and was considered to have sufficient concurrent and convergent validity. It explained a greater proportion of variance (59%) than the full version (50%). Short-version factors included safety improvement actions, teamwork, information flow and management support.

conclusionThis study provides a first proposal for a short-version Homecare Services Survey on Patient Safety Culture instrument to assess patient safety culture within homecare services. It needs further improvement, but provides a starting point for developing an improved valid and reliable short-version instrument as part of assessment of patient safety and quality improvement processes.

Indexed as

Patient SafetySafety ManagementCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNursing HomesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth & safetyPRIMARY CAREQuality in health careSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID35459662
PMCPMC9036422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.