Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459591›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans.

Elizabeth J Ela, Kathleen Broussard, Katie Hansen, Kristen L Burke, Lauren Thaxton, Joseph E Potter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth J ElaPopulation Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: ejela@utexas.edu.
Kathleen BroussardPopulation Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Katie HansenDell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Kristen L BurkePopulation Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Lauren ThaxtonPopulation Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Joseph E PotterPopulation Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI UMBERSON, DEBRA J. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior longitudinal studies of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) satisfaction and continuation guaranteed their participants access to LARC removal. Under real-world conditions, LARC users who wish to discontinue may experience barriers to LARC removal.

methodsA prospective cohort study recruited 1,700 postpartum Texans without private insurance from 8 hospitals in 6 cities. Our analysis included the 418 respondents who initiated LARC in the 24 months after childbirth. A content analysis of open-ended survey responses identified three categories of LARC users: satisfied, resigned, and dissatisfied. Satisfied LARC users were using their method of choice. Resigned users were using LARC as an alternative method when their preferred method was inaccessible. Dissatisfied users were unhappy with LARC. Multinomial logistic regression models identified risk factors for resignation and dissatisfaction. Cox proportional hazards models assessed differences in LARC discontinuation by satisfaction and sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsParticipants completed 1,505 surveys while using LARC. LARC users were satisfied in 83.46% of survey responses, resigned in 5.25%, and dissatisfied in 11.30%. Resignation was more likely if respondents were uninsured or wanted sterilization at the time of childbirth. The risk of dissatisfaction increased with time using LARC and was higher among uninsured respondents. U.S.-born Hispanic LARC users were more likely than foreign-born Hispanic LARC users to be dissatisfied and less likely to discontinue when dissatisfied. Dissatisfaction-but not resignation-predicted discontinuation. Cost, lack of insurance, and difficulty obtaining an appointment were frequent barriers to LARC removal.

conclusionsMost postpartum LARC users were satisfied, but users who wished to discontinue frequently encountered barriers.

Indexed as

Long-Acting Reversible ContraceptionContraceptionFemaleHumansPersonal SatisfactionPostpartum PeriodProspective StudiesSterilization, Reproductive

Identifiers

PMID35459591
PMCPMC9283300
OpenAlexW4224318393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.