Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Same-sex competition and sexual conflict expressed through witchcraft accusations.

Sarah Peacey, Olympia L K Campbell, Ruth Mace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Witchcraft, Envy, and Norm Enforcement in Mauritius.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  2. The Agential View of Misfortune.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Gendered conflict in the human family.Evolutionary human sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah PeaceyDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Olympia L K CampbellDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Ruth MaceDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. r.mace@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council EvoBias
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is significant cross-cultural variation in the sex of individuals most likely to be accused of practising witchcraft. Allegations of witchcraft might be a mechanism for nullifying competitors so resources they would have used become available to others. In this case, who is targeted may result from patterns of competition and conflict (same-sex or male-female) within specific relationships, which are determined by broader socio-ecological factors. Here we examine patterns of sex-specific accusations in historic cases from sub-Saharan Africa (N = 423 accusations). Male 'witches' formed the greater part of our sample, and were mostly accused by male blood-relatives and nonrelatives, often in connection to disputes over wealth and status. Accusations of women were mainly from kin by marriage, and particularly from husbands and co-wives. The most common outcomes were that the accused was forced to move, or suffered reputational damage. Our results suggest that competition underlies accusations and relationship patterns may determine who is liable to be accused.

Indexed as

WitchcraftFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMarriageSexual BehaviorSpouses

Identifiers

PMID35459279
PMCPMC9033826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.