Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459238›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial.

Gabrielle B Rocque, J Nicholas Dionne-Odom, Angela M Stover, Casey L Daniel, Andres Azuero, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, Stacey A Ingram, Jeffrey A Franks, Nicole E Caston, D' Ambra N Dent and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04809740 (Evaluating the Implementation and Impact of Navigator-delivered ePRO Home Symptom Monitoring and Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04809740 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Evaluating the Implementation and Impact of Navigator-delivered ePRO Home Symptom Monitoring and Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2021 to 2027Enrolled3,090ConditionsCancerArmsNavigator-delivered Home ePRO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. e-PRO within a Comprehensive Companion Program to reduce emergency visits and inpatient admission in a Peruvian institution.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Pharmacist-facilitated Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) monitoring: developing an EHR SmartForm© to monitor side effects of oral oncolytics during routine telehealth encounters.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gabrielle B RocqueDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA. grocque@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-9785
J Nicholas Dionne-OdomDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Angela M StoverUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL, USA.
Casey L DanielSupportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andres AzueroUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Chao-Hui Sylvia HuangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Stacey A IngramDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jeffrey A FranksDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Nicole E CastonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA.
D' Ambra N DentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ethan M BaschLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, USA.
Bradford E JacksonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, USA.
Doris HowellSupportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jennifer Young PierceUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL, USA.

Funding

Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-delivered ePRO home symptom monitoring and managementR01NR019058 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROCQUE, GABRIELLE · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR019058NINR NIH HHS R01NR019058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, improves health-related quality of life, and lengthens survival. However, oncology practices have lagged in adopting remote symptom monitoring into routine practice, where specific patient populations may have unique barriers. One approach to overcoming barriers is utilizing resources from value-based payment models, such as patient navigators who are ideally positioned to assume a leadership role in remote symptom monitoring implementation. This implementation approach has not been tested in standard of care, and thus optimal implementation strategies are needed for large-scale roll-out.

methodsThis hybrid type 2 study design evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of remote symptom monitoring for all patients and for diverse populations in two Southern academic medical centers from 2021 to 2026. This study will utilize a pragmatic approach, evaluating real-world data collected during routine care for quantitative implementation and patient outcomes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to conduct a qualitative evaluation at key time points to assess barriers and facilitators, implementation strategies, fidelity to implementation strategies, and perceived utility of these strategies. We will use a mixed-methods approach for data interpretation to finalize a formal implementation blueprint. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation of real-world implementation of remote symptom monitoring will generate a blueprint for future efforts to scale interventions across health systems with diverse patient populations within value-based healthcare models.

trial registrationNCT04809740 ; date of registration 3/22/2021.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeDelivery of Health CareHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicResearch DesignImplementation strategiesPatient-reported outcomesPayment reformReal-world dataRemote symptom monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35459238
PMCPMC9027833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.