Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459218›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2022

Assessing differences in contraceptive provision through telemedicine among reproductive health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Alison B Comfort, Lavanya Rao, Suzan Goodman, Tina Raine-Bennett, Angela Barney, Biftu Mengesha, Cynthia C Harper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison B ComfortDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Alison.comfort@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6713-5258
Lavanya RaoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Suzan GoodmanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tina Raine-BennettDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
Angela BarneyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Biftu MengeshaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Cynthia C HarperDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USDeloitte (United States) · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Understanding individual- and social network-level factors affecting infant HIV testing to design social network interventions to increase testing of HIV-exposed infantsK01HD105521 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COMFORT, ALISON B · 2021 to 2025
$722k
JPB Foundation 1088NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD105521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviders faced challenges in maintaining patient access to contraceptive services and public health safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to increased barriers to care, providers increasingly used telemedicine for contraceptive care, curbside services, mail-order pharmacies, and on-line or home delivery of contraceptive methods, including self-administration of subcutaneous depo medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SQ). To better understand how reproductive health providers adapted service provision during the pandemic, this study assessed clinical practice changes and strategies providers adopted throughout the United States to maintain contraceptive care, particularly when clinics closed on-site, and the challenges that remained in offering contraceptive services, especially to marginalized patient populations.

methodsWe surveyed U.S. providers and clinic staff (n = 907) in April 2020-January 2021, collecting data on contraceptive service delivery challenges and adaptations, including telemedicine. We assessed clinical practice changes with multivariate regression analyses using generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution and cluster robust standard errors, adjusting for clinic patient volume, practice setting, region, Title X funding, and time of survey.

resultsWhile 80% of providers reported their clinic remained open, 20% were closed on-site. Providers said the pandemic made it more difficult to offer the full range of contraceptive methods (65%), contraceptive counseling (61%) or to meet the needs of patients in marginalized communities (50%). While only 11% of providers offered telemedicine pre-pandemic, most offered telemedicine visits (79%) during the pandemic. Some used mail-order pharmacies (35%), curbside contraceptive services (22%), and DMPA-SQ for self-administration (10%). Clinics that closed on-site were more likely to use mail-order pharmacies (aRR 1.83, 95% CI [1.37-2.44]) and prescribe self-administered DMPA-SQ (aRR 3.85, 95% CI [2.40-6.18]). Clinics closed on-site were just as likely to use telemedicine as those that remained open. Among clinics using telemedicine, those closed on-site continued facing challenges in contraceptive service provision.

conclusionsClinics closing on-site were just as likely to offer telemedicine, but faced greater challenges in offering contraceptive counseling and the full range of contraceptive methods, and meeting the needs of marginalized communities. Maintaining in-person care for contraceptive services, in spite of staffing shortages and financial difficulties, is an important objective during and beyond the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesHumansPandemicsReproductive HealthUnited StatesContraceptive AgentsContraceptionCOVID-19Family planningService deliverySexual and reproductive healthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35459218
PMCPMC9026031
OpenAlexW4224214074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.