Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459166›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of Cissampelos pareira L. identified by connectivity map-based analysis and in vitro studies.

Madiha Haider, Vivek Anand, M Ghalib Enayathullah, Yash Parekh, Sushma Ram, Surekha Kumari, Anmol, Gayatri Panda, Manjari Shukla, Dhwani Dholakia and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Madiha HaiderGenomics & molecular medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, 110007, India.
Vivek AnandGenomics & molecular medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, 110007, India.
M Ghalib EnayathullahCSIR-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Yash ParekhCSIR-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Sushma RamCSIR-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Surekha KumariAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
AnmolAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Gayatri PandaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi, India.
Manjari ShuklaDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Karwar, Rajasthan, 342037, India.
Dhwani DholakiaGenomics & molecular medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, 110007, India.
Arjun RayDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi, India.
Sudipta BhattacharyyaDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Karwar, Rajasthan, 342037, India.
Upendra SharmaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Kiran Kumar BokaraCSIR-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India.
Bhavana PrasherGenomics & molecular medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, 110007, India. bhavana.p@igib.res.in.
Mitali MukerjiGenomics & molecular medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Delhi, 110007, India. mitali@iitj.ac.in.
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research · INCentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology · INIndian Institute of Technology Jodhpur · INIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · INInstitute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology · INInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · IN

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India MLP-901Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy GAP0183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViral infections have a history of abrupt and severe eruptions through the years in the form of pandemics. And yet, definitive therapies or preventive measures are not present. Herbal medicines have been a source of various antiviral compounds such as Oseltamivir, extracted using shikimic acid from star anise (Illicium verum) and Acyclovir from Carissa edulis are FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved antiviral drugs. In this study, we dissect the anti-coronavirus infection activity of Cissampelos pareira L (Cipa) extract using an integrative approach.

methodsWe analysed the signature similarities between predicted antiviral agents and Cipa using the connectivity map ( https://clue.io/ ). Next, we tested the anti-SARS-COV-2 activity of Cipa in vitro. Molecular docking analyses of constituents of with key targets of SARS-CoV2 protein viz. spike protein, RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase (RdRp) and 3C‑like proteinase. was also performed. A three-way comparative analysis of Cipa transcriptome, COVID-19 BALF transcriptome and CMAP signatures of small compounds was also performed.

resultsSeveral predicted antivirals showed a high positive connectivity score with Cipa such as apcidin, emetine, homoharringtonine etc. We also observed 98% inhibition of SARS-COV-2 replication in infected Vero cell cultures with the whole extract. Some of its prominent pure constituents e.g. pareirarine, cissamine, magnoflorine exhibited 40-80% inhibition. Comparison of genes between BALF and Cipa showed an enrichment of biological processes like transcription regulation and response to lipids, to be downregulated in Cipa while being upregulated in COVID-19. CMAP also showed that Triciribine, torin-1 and VU-0365114-2 had positive connectivity with BALF 1 and 2, and negative connectivity with Cipa. Amongst all the tested compounds, Magnoflorine and Salutaridine exhibited the most potent and consistent strong in silico binding profiles with SARS-CoV2 therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

CissampelosCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsMolecular Docking SimulationPlant ExtractsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsPlant ExtractsRNA, ViralAntivirusBALFCissampelos pareira L.Connectivity mapCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Whole plant extract

Identifiers

PMID35459166
PMCPMC9028906
OpenAlexW4225987615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.