Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459100›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

PRehabIlitatiOn with pReoperatIve exercise and educaTion for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgerY: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled TRIAL (PRIORITY TRIAL).

Daniel Steffens, Jane Young, Bernhard Riedel, Rachael Morton, Linda Denehy, Alexander Heriot, Cherry Koh, Qiang Li, Adrian Bauman, Charbel Sandroussi and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In-hospital moderate intensity interval training following surgical resection of foregut malignancy - a prospective single arm feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Exercise and Behavior: Adjuncts to Pro-Myogenic Compounds for Enhancing Mobility in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Improving outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Implementation of a teleprehabilitation program for oncosurgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives and user satisfaction.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Principles of enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Daniel SteffensSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, PO Box M157, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia. Daniel.Steffens@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-860X
Jane YoungFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bernhard RiedelDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Department of Critical Care, The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rachael MortonDepartment of Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Linda DenehyMelbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alexander HeriotDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cherry KohSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, PO Box M157, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Qiang LiStatistics Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Adrian BaumanFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Charbel SandroussiSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, PO Box M157, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Hilmy IsmailDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Department of Critical Care, The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mbathio DiengDepartment of Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nabila AnsariDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Neil PillingerFaculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah O'ShannassyInstitute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sam McKeownDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Department of Critical Care, The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Derek CunninghamCancer Voices NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kym SheehanCancer Voices NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gino IoriCancer Voices NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jenna BartynSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, PO Box M157, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Michael SolomonSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, PO Box M157, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1184471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical surgery is the mainstream treatment for patients presenting with advanced primary or recurrent gastrointestinal cancers; however, the rate of postoperative complications is exceptionally high. The current evidence suggests that improving patients' fitness during the preoperative period may enhance postoperative recovery. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to establish the effectiveness of prehabilitation with a progressive, individualised, preoperative exercise and education program compared to usual care alone in reducing the proportion of patients with postoperative in-hospital complications. The secondary aims are to investigate the effectiveness of the preoperative intervention on reducing the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, improving quality of life and morbidity, and reducing costs.

methodsThis is a multi-centre, assessor-blinded, pragmatic, comparative, randomised controlled trial. A total of 172 patients undergoing pelvic exenteration, cytoreductive surgery, oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, gastrectomy or pancreatectomy will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to prehabilitation with a preoperative exercise and education program (intervention group), delivered over 4 to 8 weeks before surgery by community physiotherapists/exercise physiologists, or usual care alone (control group). The intervention will comprise 12 to 24 individualised, progressive exercise sessions (including aerobic/anaerobic, resistance, and respiratory exercises), recommendations of home exercises (16 to 32 sessions), and daily incidental physical activity advice. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, the week prior to surgery, during the hospital stay, and on the day of discharge from hospital, and 1 month and 1 months postoperatively. The primary outcome will be the development of in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes include the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, quality of life, postoperative morbidity and costs. DISCUSSION: The successful completion of this trial will provide robust and high-quality evidence on the efficacy of a preoperative community- and home-based exercise and education intervention on important postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

trial registrationThis trial was registered prospectively with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12621000617864 ) on 24th May 2021.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsPreoperative ExerciseAustraliaExercise TherapyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPreoperative CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCancerComplicationsEducationExerciseGastrointestinalPrehabilitationPreoperativeRandomised controlled trialSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35459100
PMCPMC9026022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.