Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459084›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Assessment for Different Neural Networks with FeatureSelection in Classification Issue.

Joy Iong-Zong Chen, Chung-Sheng Pi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joy Iong-Zong ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Chunghua 515006, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-3662
Chung-Sheng PiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Chunghua 515006, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, the investigation of NN (neural network) computing systems requires the management of a significant number of simultaneous distinct algorithms, such as parallel computing, fault tolerance, classification, and data optimization. Supervised learning for NN originally comes from certain parameters, such as self-revised learning, input learning datasets, and multiple second learning processes. Specifically, the operation continues to adjust the NN connection synapses' weight to achieve a self-learning computer system. The current article is aimed at developing the CC (correlation coefficient) assignment scheme adaptively joint with the FS (feature selection) categories to pursue the solutions utilized in solving the restrictions of NN computing. The NN computing system is expected to solve high-dimensional data, data overfitting, and strict FS problems. Hence, the Fruits-360 dataset is applied in the current article, that is, the variety of fruits, the sameness of color, and the differences in appearance features are utilized to examine the NN system accuracy, performance, and loss rate. Accordingly, there are 120 different kinds with a total of 20,860 fruit image datasets collected from AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet101, which were implemented in the CC assignment scheme proposed in this article. The results are employed to verify that the accuracy rate can be improved by reducing strict FS. Finally, the results of accuracy rate from the training held for the three NN frameworks are discussed. It was discovered that the GoogLeNet model presented the most significant FS performance. The demonstrated outcomes validate that the proposed CC assignment schemes are absolutely worthwhile in designing and choosing an NN training model for feature discrimination. From the simulation results, it has been observed that the FS-based CC assignment improves the accurate rate of recognition compared to the existing state-of-the-art approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerComputer SimulationCC (correlation coefficient)FS (feature selection)NN (neural network)self-revision learningsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID35459084
PMCPMC9024463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.