Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458972›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Fine-Tuned DenseNet-169 for Breast Cancer Metastasis Prediction Using FastAI and 1-Cycle Policy.

Adarsh Vulli, Parvathaneni Naga Srinivasu, Madipally Sai Krishna Sashank, Jana Shafi, Jaeyoung Choi, Muhammad Fazal Ijaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pneumonia detection on chest X-rays from Xception-based transfer learning and logistic regression.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adarsh VulliDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam 530045, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3346-6256
Parvathaneni Naga SrinivasuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering-AIML, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 500090, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9247-9132
Madipally Sai Krishna SashankDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam 530045, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0192-4179
Jana ShafiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Arts and Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Wadi Ad-Dawasir 11991, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-670X
Jaeyoung ChoiSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9118-8050
Muhammad Fazal IjazDepartment of Intelligent Mechatronics Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5206-272X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1C1C1004590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node metastasis in breast cancer may be accurately predicted using a DenseNet-169 model. However, the current system for identifying metastases in a lymph node is manual and tedious. A pathologist well-versed with the process of detection and characterization of lymph nodes goes through hours investigating histological slides. Furthermore, because of the massive size of most whole-slide images (WSI), it is wise to divide a slide into batches of small image patches and apply methods independently on each patch. The present work introduces a novel method for the automated diagnosis and detection of metastases from whole slide images using the Fast AI framework and the 1-cycle policy. Additionally, it compares this new approach to previous methods. The proposed model has surpassed other state-of-art methods with more than 97.4% accuracy. In addition, a mobile application is developed for prompt and quick response. It collects user information and models to diagnose metastases present in the early stages of cancer. These results indicate that the suggested model may assist general practitioners in accurately analyzing breast cancer situations, hence preventing future complications and mortality. With digital image processing, histopathologic interpretation and diagnostic accuracy have improved considerably.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesPolicy1-cycle policycancercomputational histopathologyDenseNet-169diagnostic odds ratioFastAIlymph nodeswhole-slide images

Identifiers

PMID35458972
PMCPMC9025766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.