Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458954›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Performance of Deep Learning Models in Forecasting Gait Trajectories of Children with Neurological Disorders.

Rania Kolaghassi, Mohamad Kenan Al-Hares, Gianluca Marcelli, Konstantinos Sirlantzis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rania KolaghassiSchool of Engineering, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-6032
Mohamad Kenan Al-HaresSchool of Engineering, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-8479
Gianluca MarcelliSchool of Engineering, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-7327
Konstantinos SirlantzisSchool of Engineering, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0847-8880

Funding

European Union Interreg 2 Seas Program 2014-2020 of the European Regional Development Fund (M.O.T.I.O.N Project) 2S05-038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forecasted gait trajectories of children could be used as feedforward input to control lower limb robotic devices, such as exoskeletons and actuated orthotic devices (e.g., Powered Ankle Foot Orthosis-PAFO). Several studies have forecasted healthy gait trajectories, but, to the best of our knowledge, none have forecasted gait trajectories of children with pathological gait yet. These exhibit higher inter- and intra-subject variability compared to typically developing gait of healthy subjects. Pathological trajectories represent the typical gait patterns that rehabilitative exoskeletons and actuated orthoses would target. In this study, we implemented two deep learning models, a Long-Term Short Memory (LSTM) and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), to forecast hip, knee, and ankle trajectories in terms of corresponding Euler angles in the pitch, roll, and yaw form for children with neurological disorders, up to 200 ms in the future. The deep learning models implemented in our study are trained on data (available online) from children with neurological disorders collected by Gillette Children's Speciality Healthcare over the years 1994-2017. The children's ages range from 4 to 19 years old and the majority of them had cerebral palsy (73%), while the rest were a combination of neurological, developmental, orthopaedic, and genetic disorders (27%). Data were recorded with a motion capture system (VICON) with a sampling frequency of 120 Hz while walking for 15 m. We investigated a total of 35 combinations of input and output time-frames, with window sizes for input vectors ranging from 50-1000 ms, and output vectors from 8.33-200 ms. Results show that LSTMs outperform CNNs, and the gap in performance becomes greater the larger the input and output window sizes are. The maximum difference between the Mean Absolute Errors (MAEs) of the CNN and LSTM networks was 0.91 degrees. Results also show that the input size has no significant influence on mean prediction errors when the output window is 50 ms or smaller. For output window sizes greater than 50 ms, the larger the input window, the lower the error. Overall, we obtained MAEs ranging from 0.095-2.531 degrees for the LSTM network, and from 0.129-2.840 degrees for the CNN. This study establishes the feasibility of forecasting pathological gait trajectories of children which could be integrated with exoskeleton control systems and experimentally explores the characteristics of such intelligent systems under varying input and output window time-frames.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyDeep LearningAdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaChildChild, PreschoolFootGaitHumansWalkingYoung Adultactuated orthosesartificial intelligencechildrendeep learningexoskeletonsforecastinggaitkinematicslower limb robotmotion capturepathological gaitprediction

Identifiers

PMID35458954
PMCPMC9033153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.