Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458937›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Movement Quality Parameters during Gait Assessed by a Single Accelerometer in Subjects with Osteoarthritis and Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Jill Emmerzaal, Kristoff Corten, Rob van der Straaten, Liesbet De Baets, Sam Van Rossom, Annick Timmermans, Ilse Jonkers, Benedicte Vanwanseele

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07367789 (Prediction of Patient-reported Outcome Measure and Performance-based Measure After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Instrumented Insoles and Deep Neural Networks), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07367789 recruitingnot on this map

Prediction of Patient-reported Outcome Measure and Performance-based Measure After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Instrumented Insoles and Deep Neural Networks

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Total Knee ArthroplastyArmsInstrumented Insole Gait Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Monitoring Gait Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Wearable Sensors: Responsiveness of Gait Accelerations.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jill EmmerzaalHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-7604
Kristoff CortenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, 3600 Genk, Belgium.
Rob van der StraatenREVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5071-2124
Liesbet De BaetsPain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-2090
Sam Van RossomHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-9796
Annick TimmermansREVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-947X
Ilse JonkersHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7611-3747
Benedicte VanwanseeleHuman Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-9483

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders T004716N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's aim is threefold: (I) Evaluate movement quality parameters of gait in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared to asymptomatic controls from a single trunk-worn 3D accelerometer. (II) Evaluate the sensitivity of these parameters to capture changes at 6-weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12-months following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). (III) Investigate whether observed changes in movement quality from 6-weeks and 12-months post-TKA relates to changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We invited 20 asymptomatic controls, 20 people with hip OA, 18 people pre- and post-TKA to our movement lap. They wore a single trunk-worn accelerometer and walked at a self-selected speed. Movement quality parameters (symmetry, complexity, smoothness, and dynamic stability) were calculated from the 3D acceleration signal. Between groups and between timepoints comparisons were made, and changes in movement quality were correlated with PROMs. We found significant differences in symmetry and stability in both OA groups. Post-TKA, most parameters reflected an initial decrease in movement quality at 6-weeks post-TKA, which mostly normalised 6-months post-TKA. Finally, improved movement quality relates to improvements in PROMs. Thus, a single accelerometer can characterise movement quality in both OA groups and post-TKA. The correlation shows the potential to monitor movement quality in a clinical setting to inform objective, data-driven personalised rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeAccelerometryBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansKnee Jointbiomechanicship osteoarthritisknee osteoarthritislevel walkingmovement qualitytotal knee arthroplastytrunk-worn accelerometer

Identifiers

PMID35458937
PMCPMC9029923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.