ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Adaptive Pedestrian Stride Estimation for Localization: From Multi-Gait Perspective.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Context-Aware Smartphone-Based 3D Indoor Positioning Using Pedestrian Dead Reckoning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and reliable stride length estimation modules play a significant role in Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR) systems, but the accuracy of stride length calculation suffers from individual differences. This paper presents a stride length prediction strategy for PDR systems that can be adapted across individuals and broad walking velocity fields. It consists of a multi-gait division algorithm, which can divide a full stride into push-off, swing, heel-strike, and stance based on multi-axis IMU data. Additionally, based on the acquired gait phases, the correlation between multiple features of distinct gait phases and the stride length is analyzed, and multi regression models are merged to output the stride length value. In experimental tests, the gait segmentation algorithm provided gait phases division with the F-score of 0.811, 0.748, 0.805, and 0.819 for stance, push-off, swing, heel-strike, respectively, and IoU of 0.482, 0.69, 0.509 for push-off, swing, heel-strike, respectively. The root means square error (RMSE) of our proposed stride length estimation was 151.933, and the relative error for total distance in varying walking speed tests was less than 2%. The experimental results validated that our proposed gait phase segmentation algorithm can accurately recognize gait phases for individuals with wide walking speed ranges. With no need for parameter modification, the stride length method based on the fusion of multiple predictions from different gait phases can provide better accuracy than the estimations based on the full stride.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.