Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458733›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Antibacterial and Wound-Healing Activities of Statistically Optimized Nitrofurazone- and Lidocaine-Loaded Silica Microspheres by the Box-Behnken Design.

Hafeez Ullah Khan, Fahmeed Nasir, Safirah Maheen, Syed Salman Shafqat, Shahid Shah, Ahmed Khames, Mohammed M Ghoneim, Ghulam Abbas, Saleha Shabbir, Mohamed A Abdelgawad and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Hafeez Ullah KhanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Fahmeed NasirDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Safirah MaheenDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Syed Salman ShafqatDepartment of Chemistry, University of Education, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-3065
Shahid ShahDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Ahmed KhamesDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7917-975X
Mohammed M GhoneimDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Ad Diriyah 13713, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-4373
Ghulam AbbasDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-3911
Saleha ShabbirDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Mohamed A AbdelgawadDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-5638
Mohammad A S AbourehabDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-6567
Amna IrfanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Amani M El SisiDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt.
University of Sargodha · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKAlmaarefa UniversityBeni-Suef University · EGJouf University · SATaif University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SAUniversity of Okara · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current study, nitrofurazone- (NFZ) and lidocaine-loaded (LD) silica microspheres were fabricated to address pathological indications of skin infections. The microspheres were prepared by the sol-gel method applying the Box-Behnken design and evaluated for size distribution, morphology, zeta potential, physico-chemical compatibility, XRD, thermogravimetric analysis, antibacterial and cytotoxicity activities. The comparative in vitro drug release study of microspheres revealed a 30% release of NFZ and 33% of LD after 8 h. The microspheres showed 81% percentage yield (PY) and 71.9% entrapment efficiency. XRD patterns confirmed the entrapment of NFZ-LD in silica microspheres with a significant reduction in crystallinity of the drugs. Thermal and FTIR studies proved the absence of any profound interactions of the formulation ingredients. The smooth spherical microspheres had a -28 mV zeta potential and a 10-100 µm size distribution. In vitro antibacterial activities of the NFZ-LD microspheres showed an increased zone of inhibition compared to pure drug suspensions. The in vivo efficacy tested on rabbits showed a comparatively rapid wound healing with complete lack of skin irritation impact. The cytotoxicity studies revealed more acceptability of silica microspheres with negligible harm to cells. The study suggests that the NFZ- and LD-loaded silica microspheres would be an ideal system for accelerating and promoting rapid healing of various acute and chronic wounds.

Indexed as

NitrofurazoneSilicon DioxideAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsLidocaineMicrospheresParticle SizeRabbitsWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsLidocaineNitrofurazoneSilicon Dioxideantibacterial therapeuticsBox–Behnken designlidocainenitrofurazonesilica microspheres

Identifiers

PMID35458733
PMCPMC9032706
OpenAlexW4224228920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.