Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458710›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Consensus Compound/Bioactivity Dataset for Data-Driven Drug Design and Chemogenomics.

Laura Isigkeit, Apirat Chaikuad, Daniel Merk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. PubChem 2023 update.Nucleic acids research · 2023
    Article
  14. Compilation of Custom Compound/Bioactivity Datasets from Public Repositories.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  15. An Introduction to Chemogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura IsigkeitInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0168-1093
Apirat ChaikuadInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1120-2209
Daniel MerkInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 875510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Publicly available compound and bioactivity databases provide an essential basis for data-driven applications in life-science research and drug design. By analyzing several bioactivity repositories, we discovered differences in compound and target coverage advocating the combined use of data from multiple sources. Using data from ChEMBL, PubChem, IUPHAR/BPS, BindingDB, and Probes & Drugs, we assembled a consensus dataset focusing on small molecules with bioactivity on human macromolecular targets. This allowed an improved coverage of compound space and targets, and an automated comparison and curation of structural and bioactivity data to reveal potentially erroneous entries and increase confidence. The consensus dataset comprised of more than 1.1 million compounds with over 10.9 million bioactivity data points with annotations on assay type and bioactivity confidence, providing a useful ensemble for computational applications in drug design and chemogenomics.

Indexed as

Drug DesignConsensusDatabases, FactualHumansbig datadata curationde novo designmachine learningmedicinal chemistry

Identifiers

PMID35458710
PMCPMC9028877
OpenAlexW4223937330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.