Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458706›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Using Big Data Analytics to "Back Engineer" Protein Conformational Selection Mechanisms.

Shivangi Gupta, Jerome Baudry, Vineetha Menon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shivangi GuptaDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-8161
Jerome BaudryDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.
Vineetha MenonDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6916-5346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the living cells, proteins bind small molecules (or "ligands") through a "conformational selection" mechanism, where a subset of protein structures are capable of binding the small molecules well while most other protein structures are not capable of such binding. The present work uses machine learning approaches to identify, in a very large amount of protein:ligand complexes, what protein properties are associated with their capacity to bind small molecules. In order to do so, we calculate 40 physicochemical properties on about 1.5 millions of protein conformations: ligand and protein conformations. This work describes a machine learning approach to identify the unique physico-chemical descriptors of a protein that maximize the prediction rate of potential protein molecular conformations for the test case proteins ADORA2A (Adenosine A2a Receptor), ADRB2 (Adrenoceptor Beta 2) and OPRK1 (Opioid Receptor Kappa 1). We find adequate machine learning techniques can increase by an order of magnitude the identification of "binding protein conformations" in an otherwise very large ensemble of protein conformations, compared to random selection of protein conformations. This opens the door to the systematic identification of such "binding conformations" for proteins and provides a big data approach to the conformational selection mechanism.

Indexed as

Data ScienceMachine LearningLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsLigandsProteinsbig datadeep learningdrug discoveryfeature selectionmachine learningprotein conformation selection

Identifiers

PMID35458706
PMCPMC9025728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.