ArticlePolymers2022
A Comparison of Numerical and Actual Measurements of Large-Scale Rib-Structured Pallet Flatness Using Recycled Polypropylene in Injection Molding.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many challenges are associated with the injection molding process for forming a rib-structured pallet (1100 mm × 1100 mm × 140 mm, length × width × height) because greater flowing resistance through the rib channels within the pallet can induce insufficient filling. Essentially, multi-gate filling involves a sequential valve gate system, which helps to spread the filling front with fewer weld lines. Based on the presetting of the sequential scheme of the valve gates, actual measurements of pallet flatness using the ATOS scan system were compared to numerical warpage measurements of a pallet derived by Moldex3D 2020. In this study, we propose a sequential scheme by actuating the valve gates to open once the flow front spreads towards them; then, actual warpage measurements of a pallet are compared with numerical measurements. The results show that the warpage of the top surface of the pallet is 5.144 mm in actual measurements and 5.729 mm in simulation. The results all indicated small warpage with respect to the pallet size. The simulation and actual measurements of flatness are in excellent agreement; the difference in top flatness between the simulated and actual pallet is 0.59 mm, while the bottom flatness difference is 0.035 mm. By adjusting the cooling water temperature, increasing the mold temperature, and decreasing the material temperature, overall flatness and warpage displacement can be reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.