Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458331›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Forecasting the Mechanical Properties of Plastic Concrete Employing Experimental Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms: DT, MLPNN, SVM, and RF.

Afnan Nafees, Sherbaz Khan, Muhammad Faisal Javed, Raid Alrowais, Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed, Abdullah Mohamed, Nikolai Ivanovic Vatin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Afnan NafeesDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.
Sherbaz KhanNUST Institute of Civil Engineering NICE, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering SCEE, National University of Sciences and Technology NUST, Sector H-12, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Faisal JavedDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.
Raid AlrowaisDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-7863
Abdeliazim Mustafa MohamedDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 16273, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-5057
Abdullah MohamedResearch Centre, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.
Nikolai Ivanovic VatinInstitute of Civil Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195291 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAJouf University · SANational University of Sciences and Technology · PKPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased population necessitates an expansion of infrastructure and urbanization, resulting in growth in the construction industry. A rise in population also results in an increased plastic waste, globally. Recycling plastic waste is a global concern. Utilization of plastic waste in concrete can be an optimal solution from recycling perspective in construction industry. As environmental issues continue to grow, the development of predictive machine learning models is critical. Thus, this study aims to create modelling tools for estimating the compressive and tensile strengths of plastic concrete. For predicting the strength of concrete produced with plastic waste, this research integrates machine learning algorithms (individual and ensemble techniques), including bagging and adaptive boosting by including weak learners. For predicting the mechanical properties, 80 cylinders for compressive strength and 80 cylinders for split tensile strength were casted and tested with varying percentages of irradiated plastic waste, either as of cement or fine aggregate replacement. In addition, a thorough and reliable database, including 320 compressive strength tests and 320 split tensile strength tests, was generated from existing literature. Individual, bagging and adaptive boosting models of decision tree, multilayer perceptron neural network, and support vector machines were developed and compared with modified learner model of random forest. The results implied that individual model response was enriched by utilizing bagging and boosting learners. A random forest with a modified learner algorithm provided the robust performance of the models with coefficient correlation of 0.932 for compressive strength and 0.86 for split tensile strength with the least errors. Sensitivity analyses showed that tensile strength models were least sensitive to water and coarse aggregates, while cement, silica fume, coarse aggregate, and age have a substantial effect on compressive strength models. To minimize overfitting errors and corroborate the generalized modelling result, a cross-validation K-Fold technique was used. Machine learning algorithms are used to predict mechanical properties of plastic concrete to promote sustainability in construction industry.

Indexed as

baggingboostingcorrelation coefficientcross-validationensemble techniquesirradiated plastic wastemachine learningplastic concretepredictive modelingsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID35458331
PMCPMC9026837
OpenAlexW4223935544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.