ArticlePolymers2022
Structural Integrity of the Aircraft Interior Spare Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive Manufacturing of Aerospace Composites: A Critical Review of the Material-Process-Design Interplay and Prospects for Application.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effects of Printing Orientation on the Tensile, Thermophysical, Smoke Density, and Toxicity Properties of UltemPolymers · 2025Article
- Durability of Ultem 9085 in Marine Environments: A Consideration in Fused Filament Fabrication of Structural Components.Polymers · 2024Article
- Article
- Development of a maturity model for additive manufacturing: A conceptual model proposal.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Chlorinated Polyethylene Honeycomb Mechanical Performance as Opposed to an Aluminum Alloy Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, the results obtained for the structural integrity of two real-life aircraft interior parts produced by using Ultem 9085 and the fused deposition modeling (FDM) are presented. Numerical simulation was used to perform static mechanical analysis of the class divider subjected to the case of the most critical load. By using a simple beam model, it was identified that the most efficient way of increasing the bending stiffness (required to pass the most crucial load case test) would be to increase the part's width of the class divider. Mechanical testing of the parts was performed in vertical and horizontal load directions to supplement the numerical results. For the class divider, it was testified that the 3D-printed part would not fail under the most critical load case. For the folding table printed as a honeycomb structure, when loaded at the tip, the critical load of 900 N was acceptable, and as it was shown, there was significant potential for further optimization of the structure to either increase the maximum load or reduce the weight for any given load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.