Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458276›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Kacper Kroczek, Paweł Turek, Damian Mazur, Jacek Szczygielski, Damian Filip, Robert Brodowski, Krzysztof Balawender, Łukasz Przeszłowski, Bogumił Lewandowski, Stanisław Orkisz and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kacper KroczekDoctoral School of Engineering and Technical Sciences, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-1831
Paweł TurekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-4815
Damian MazurFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3247-5903
Jacek SzczygielskiFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3157-2824
Damian FilipInstitute of Medical Science, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Robert BrodowskiDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Fryderyk Chopin Clinical Voivodeship Hospital No.1 in Rzeszow, 35-055 Rzeszow, Poland.
Krzysztof BalawenderFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Łukasz PrzeszłowskiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-9069
Bogumił LewandowskiFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8045-5093
Stanisław OrkiszFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Artur MazurFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-3515
Grzegorz BudzikFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3598-2860
Józef CebulskiInstitute of Physics, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Mariusz OleksyFaculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering is an interdisciplinary field of science that has developed very intensively in recent years. The first part of this review describes materials with medical and dental applications from the following groups: metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites. Both positive and negative sides of their application are presented from the point of view of medical application and mechanical properties. A variety of techniques for the manufacture of biomedical components are presented in this review. The main focus of this work is on additive manufacturing and 3D printing, as these modern techniques have been evaluated to be the best methods for the manufacture of medical and dental devices. The second part presents devices for skull bone reconstruction. The materials from which they are made and the possibilities offered by 3D printing in this field are also described. The last part concerns dental transitional implants (scaffolds) for guided bone regeneration, focusing on polylactide-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite due to its unique properties. This section summarises the current knowledge of scaffolds, focusing on the material, mechanical and biological requirements, the effects of these devices on the human body, and their great potential for applications.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingcranioplastyguided bone regenerationhydroxyapatitenanocompositepolylactidescaffoldstransitional implant

Identifiers

PMID35458276
PMCPMC9027145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.