Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458253›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Pyrolysis Evaluation of Tennis String Polyurethane and Water-Borne Polyurethane Wastes through Isoconversional Kinetic Analysis.

Haibo Wan, Zhen Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haibo WanDepartment of Physical Education, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China.
Zhen HuangDepartment of Packaging Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3920-4882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A detailed kinetic analysis of pyrolysis processes of Tennis string polyurethane (TSPU) waste and waterborne polyurethane (WPU) waste was carried out in the present paper. Non-isothermal pyrolysis characterizations of two wastes were acquired through thermogravimetric determinations under the constant heating rates of 5, 10, 15 and 20 K/min. Experimental results showed that the pyrolysis processes of TSPU and WPU were mainly characteristic of three stages and two stages, respectively. Two pyrolysis performance indices, the devolatilization index (DI) and heat-resistance index (HRI), were used to interpret the heating rate effect on the pyrolysis features and different thermal dependences of TSPU and WPU. Isoconversional kinetic analysis was thoroughly performed with model-free and model-fitting methods. By using Starink, Vyazovkin-Dollimore and Coats-Redfern methods, the activation energies thus obtained were in the range of 103.3~148.3 kJ/mol and 92.5~204.3 kJ/mol, respectively, for TSPU and WPU, over the entire pyrolysis process. Their respective pre-exponential factor lnA values were determined to be within 17.94~33.42 min

Indexed as

isoconversional kinetic analysisnon-isothermal pyrolysispolyurethanethermogravimetric analysis

Identifiers

PMID35458253
PMCPMC9025778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.