Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458230›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Yue Li, Liangjie Zhao, Meiling Hou, Tianlin Gao, Jin Sun, Hao Luo, Fengdan Wang, Feng Zhong, Aiguo Ma, Jing Cai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. ProbioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue LiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Liangjie ZhaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Meiling HouDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Tianlin GaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Jin SunDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Hao LuoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Fengdan WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Feng ZhongDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.
Aiguo MaDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-8844
Jing CaiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6889-0685
Qingdao University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81673160National Natural Science Foundation of China 81803222National Natural Science Foundation of China 81903305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adverse effects of anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs in the intestines were related to alteration of the intestinal microbiota. However, there was less information about microbial metabolism on the adverse reactions. This study aimed to explore whether Lactobacillus casei could regulate gut microbiota or short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) disorders to protect intestinal adverse reactions induced by isoniazid (H) and rifampicin (R). Male Wistar rats were given low and high doses of Lactobacillus casei two hours before daily administration of anti-TB drugs. After 42 days, colon tissue and blood were collected for analysis. The feces at two-week and six-week were collected to analyze the microbial composition and the content of SCFAs in colon contents was determined. Supplementation of Lactobacillus casei increased the proportion of intestinal goblet cells induced by H and R (p < 0.05). In addition, HR also reduced the level of mucin-2 (p < 0.05), and supplementation of Lactobacillus casei restored. After two weeks of HR intervention, a decrease in OTUs, diversity index, the abundance of Bacteroides, Akkermansia, and Blautia, and an increase of the abundance of Lacetospiraceae NK4A136 group and Rumencoccus UCG-005, were observed compared with the control group (p all < 0.05). These indices in Lactobacillus casei intervention groups were similar to the HR group. Six-week intervention resulted in a dramatic reduction of Lacetospiraceae NK4A136 group, butyric acid, valeric acid and hexanoic acid, while an increase of Bacteroides and Blautia (p all < 0.05). Pretreatment with Lactobacillus casei significantly increased the content of hexanoic acid compared with HR group (p < 0.05). Lactobacillus casei might prevent intestinal injury induced by anti-tuberculosis drugs by regulating gut microbiota and SCFAs metabolism.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLacticaseibacillus caseiProbioticsAnimalsAntitubercular AgentsCaproatesFatty Acids, VolatileIntestinesMaleRatsRats, WistarAntitubercular AgentsCaproatesFatty Acids, Volatileanti-TB druggut microbiotaLactobacillus caseishort chain fatty acid

Identifiers

PMID35458230
PMCPMC9032531
OpenAlexW4224255467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.