Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458151›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Effect of Combined Protein-Enriched Enteral Nutrition and Early Cycle Ergometry in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients-A Pilot Study.

Ilya Kagan, Jonathan Cohen, Itai Bendavid, Sandy Kramer, Ronit Mesilati-Stahy, Yehuda Glass, Miriam Theilla, Pierre Singer

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Sarcopenia and frailty in critical illness.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ilya KaganDepartment of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin, Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1874-9581
Jonathan CohenDepartment of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin, Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.
Itai BendavidDepartment of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin, Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.
Sandy KramerDepartment of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin, Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.
Ronit Mesilati-StahyLaboratory of Nutrition and Metabolism Research, Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.
Yehuda GlassMedical Intensive Care Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa 31096, Israel.
Miriam TheillaDepartment of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin, Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2207-3687
Pierre SingerDepartment of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin, Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel.
Rabin Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · ILRambam Health Care Campus · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCycle ergometry (CE) is a method of exercise used in clinical practice. Limited data demonstrate its effectiveness in critically ill patients. We aimed to evaluate the combination of CE and a high-protein diet in critically ill patients.

methodsThis was an open label pilot trial comparing conventional physiotherapy with enteral nutrition (EN) (control, Group 1), CE with EN (Group 2), and CE with protein-enriched EN (Group 3). The primary outcome was length of ventilation (LOV). Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, length of ICU stay (ICU LOS), length of hospital stay (Hospital LOS), and rate of re-intubation.

resultsPer protocol, 41 ICU patients were enrolled. Thirteen patients were randomized to Group 1 (control), fourteen patients to Group 2, and fourteen patients to Group 3 (study groups). We found no statistically significant difference in LOV between the study arms (14.2 ± 9.6 days, 15.8 ± 7.1 days, and 14.9 ± 9.4 days, respectively,

conclusionsIn this pilot trial, CE combined with either standard EN or protein-enriched EN was not associated with better clinical outcomes, as compared to conventional physiotherapy with standard EN. Larger trials are needed in order to further evaluate this combination.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionErgometryHumansLength of StayParenteral NutritionPilot ProjectsRespiration, Artificialcritical carecycle ergometryenteral nutritionhigh-protein dietphysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35458151
PMCPMC9027967
OpenAlexW4223457528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.