ArticleMicromachines2022
An Endovascular Catheterization Robotic System Using Collaborative Operation with Magnetically Controlled Haptic Force Feedback.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The benefits of haptic feedback in robot assisted surgery and their moderators: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- A Master-Follower Teleoperation System for Robotic Catheterisation: Design, Characterisation and Tracking Control.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- A ferrofluid-based haptic guidance system for robot-assisted endovascular procedures.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Virtual Inspection System for Pumping Stations with Multimodal Feedback.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Survey of Recent Developments in Magnetic Microrobots for Micro-/Nano-Manipulation.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Robotic endovascular peripheral arterial interventions: a proposal of a new learning model.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- The Use of Tactile Sensors in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Technical and Clinical Progress on Robot-Assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Embracing robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: Potential benefits, challenges, and scope in the future.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted technology is often used to perform endovascular catheterization surgeries, which generally depend on the flexible operability and the accurate force feedback of a robotic system. In this paper, an endovascular catheterization robotic system (ECRS) was developed to improve collaborative operation and haptic force feedback. A couple of operating handles were designed to maximize the use of the natural operations of surgeons on the master side, which is a flexible and ergonomic device. A magnetically controlled haptic force feedback structure is proposed based on hydrogel and solid magnetorheological (MR) fluid to offer a sense of haptic feedback to operators; this has potential influence on the field of force feedback. In addition, a unique tremor-reduction structure is introduced to enhance operating safety. Tracking performance experiments and in vitro experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the developed ECRS. According to these experimental results, the average translation-tracking error is 0.94 mm, and the average error of rotation is 0.89 degrees. Moreover, in vitro experiments demonstrated that haptic feedback has the advantage of reducing workload and shortening surgery completion time. The developed ECRS also has the benefits of inspiring other researchers to study collaborative robots and magnetically controlled feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.