Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457765›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

"Did You Bring It Home with You?" A Qualitative Investigation of the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Victorian Frontline Healthcare Workers and Their Families.

Jade Sheen, Elizabeth M Clancy, Julie Considine, Alison Dwyer, Phillip Tchernegovski, Anna Aridas, Brian En Chyi Lee, Andrea Reupert, Leanne Boyd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jade SheenSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong 3200, Australia.
Elizabeth M ClancySchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong 3200, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-7203
Julie ConsidineCentre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong 3200, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-2456
Alison DwyerEastern Health Melbourne, Box Hill 3128, Australia.
Phillip TchernegovskiSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia.
Anna AridasSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong 3200, Australia.
Brian En Chyi LeeSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong 3200, Australia.
Andrea ReupertSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1447-7769
Leanne BoydEastern Health Melbourne, Box Hill 3128, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9957-6357
Deakin University · AUEastern Health · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

Government of Victoria PJ07116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns regarding the physical and mental health impacts of frontline healthcare roles during the COVID-19 pandemic have been well documented, but the impacts on family functioning remain unclear. This study provides a unique contribution to the literature by considering the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline healthcare workers and their families. Thirty-nine frontline healthcare workers from Victoria, Australia, who were parents to at least one child under 18 were interviewed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Five superordinate and 14 subordinate themes were identified. Themes included more family time during lockdowns, but at a cost; changes in family responsibilities and routines; managing increased demands; healthcare workers hypervigilance and fear of bringing COVID-19 home to their family members; ways in which families worked to "get through it". While efforts have been made by many healthcare organisations to support their workers during this challenging time, the changes in family functioning observed by participants suggest that more could be done for this vulnerable cohort, particularly with respect to family support.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildCommunicable Disease ControlHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VictoriaCOVID-19family functioningfrontlinehealthcare workerpandemic

Identifiers

PMID35457765
PMCPMC9027899
OpenAlexW4224296733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.