Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457747›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Pharmacological Cardioversion in Patients with Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease Subanalysis of the CANT II Study.

Beata Ceynowa-Sielawko, Maciej T Wybraniec, Aleksandra Topp-Zielińska, Aleksander Maciąg, Dawid Miśkowiec, Paweł Balsam, Maciej Wójcik, Wojciech Wróbel, Michał M Farkowski, Edyta Ćwiek-Rębowska and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Usability of CHAFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Beata Ceynowa-SielawkoDepartment of Cardiology and Interventional Angiology, Kashubian Center for Heart and Vascular Diseases, Pomeranian Hospitals, 84-200 Wejherowo, Poland.
Maciej T WybraniecFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Upper Silesia Medical Centre, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1151-8385
Aleksandra Topp-ZielińskaDepartment of Cardiology and Interventional Angiology, Kashubian Center for Heart and Vascular Diseases, Pomeranian Hospitals, 84-200 Wejherowo, Poland.
Aleksander Maciąg2nd Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.
Dawid MiśkowiecClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-9550
Paweł BalsamClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej WójcikClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-7811
Wojciech WróbelFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Upper Silesia Medical Centre, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.
Michał M FarkowskiClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1673-7712
Edyta Ćwiek-RębowskaDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, 91-347 Lodz, Poland.
Krzysztof OzierańskiClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-0922
Robert BłaszczykClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-5006
Karolina BulaFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Upper Silesia Medical Centre, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-4083
Tomasz DembowskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, 91-347 Lodz, Poland.
Michał Peller1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8519-3707
Bartosz Krzowski1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-870X
Wojciech WańhaClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-9496
Marek KozińskiClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-4802
Jarosław D KasprzakClub 30' of the Polish Cardiac Society, 00-193 Warsaw, Poland.
Hanna SzwedDepartment of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Rehabilitation, National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Mizia-StecFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Upper Silesia Medical Centre, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-2799
Marek SzołkiewiczDepartment of Cardiology and Interventional Angiology, Kashubian Center for Heart and Vascular Diseases, Pomeranian Hospitals, 84-200 Wejherowo, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-4014
Medical University of Silesia · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLInstitute of Cardiology · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLFoundation of Cardiac Surgery Development · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) is commonly a primary option for termination of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in emergency departments (ED). This is a subanalysis of the CANT II study, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of antazoline in patients (n = 777) at three stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD): Group I > 60 mL/min (n = 531), Group II 45−59 mL/min (n = 149), and Group III < 45 mL/min (n = 97). Patients in Group III were older and with a higher prevalence of co-morbidities; however, we did not find statistically significant differences in the overall effectiveness of PCV in comparison with the other groups. In patients receiving amiodarone, the PCV success rate was similar in all the studied groups, but along with a renal function decline, it decreased in patients receiving antazoline (79.1 vs. 35%; p < 0.001), and it increased almost significantly in patients receiving propafenone (69.9 vs. 100%; p = 0.067). In patients in Group I, antazoline restored a sinus rhythm as effectively as propafenone and amiodarone; however, in patients in Group III, both antazoline and amiodarone became less effective in restoring a sinus rhythm than propafenone (p = 0.002 and p = 0.034, respectively). The rate of safety endpoint was the highest in patients in Group III (eGFR < 45 mL/min), and it was significantly higher than in patients in Groups I and II (p = 0.008 and p = 0.036, respectively). We did not observe antazoline-related adverse events in any of the studied groups of patients. This real-world registry analysis revealed a different influence of CKD on the effectiveness of individual drugs, and while propafenone and amiodarone maintained their AF termination efficacy, antazoline became significantly less effective in restoring sinus rhythm.

Indexed as

AmiodaroneAntazolineAtrial FibrillationRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsElectric CountershockFemaleHumansMalePropafenoneTreatment OutcomeAmiodaroneAntazolineAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsPropafenoneamiodaroneantazolineatrial fibrillationchronic kidney diseasepharmacological cardioversionpropafenone

Identifiers

PMID35457747
PMCPMC9025387
OpenAlexW4223993428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.