Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457744›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women.

Brittanie Lockard, Michelle Mardock, Jonathan M Oliver, Mike Byrd, Sunday Simbo, Andrew R Jagim, Julie Kresta, Claire C Baetge, Yanghoon Peter Jung, Majid S Koozehchian and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04372771 (Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04372771 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas A&M UniversityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled120ConditionsDiet ModificationArmsCurves Circuit, Weight Watchers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brittanie LockardSchool of Nursing and Health Professions, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX 78209, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-7753
Michelle MardockExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Jonathan M OliverExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Mike ByrdExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Sunday SimboExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Andrew R JagimDepartment of Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, WI 54650, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-5096
Julie KrestaCollege of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University Central-Texas, Killeen, TX 76549, USA.
Claire C BaetgeExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Yanghoon Peter JungCJ CheilJedang, Suwon 16495, Korea.
Majid S KoozehchianDepartment of Kinesiology, Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, AL 36265, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1257-9876
Deepesh KhannaDepartment of Foundational Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Clearwater, FL 33759, USA.
Chris RasmussenExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Richard B KreiderExercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-1658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the efficacy of two popular weight loss approaches on weight loss, body composition, and markers of health in sedentary obese women.

methodsIn total, 51 sedentary women (age 34.5 ± 7.7 yrs.; weight 90.0 ± 14.5 kg; BMI 34.0 ± 5.1 kg/m

resultsSupervised CV training resulted in greater amounts of vigorous and total physical activity. After 16 weeks, both groups lost weight (WW -6.1 [-7.8, -4.6], CV -4.9 [-6.2, -3.2] kg,

conclusionBoth interventions promoted weight loss and improvements in fitness and markers of health. The CV program, which included supervised resistance training and higher protein diet menus, promoted greater fat loss, increases in lean mass, and improvements in percent body fat and blood lipids.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, #NCT04372771, registered retrospectively 1 May 2020.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight LossAdultBiomarkersBody CompositionBody Mass IndexDietExerciseFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersbody compositionfat losshigh-protein diettraining adaptations

Identifiers

PMID35457744
PMCPMC9032860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.