ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Exploring the Relationship between Urban Youth Sentiment and the Built Environment Using Machine Learning and Weibo Comments.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study on the relationship between internet popularity and emotional perception of urban parks using Weibo data in Luoyang, China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the non-linear relationship and synergistic effect between urban built environment and public sentiment integrating macro- and micro-level perspective: a case study in San Francisco.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Consumers' Opinions towards Public Health Effects of Online Games: An Empirical Study Based on Social Media Comments in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Big Data, Decision Models, and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the relationship between the built environment and the sense of human experience becomes increasingly important, emotional geography has begun to focus on sentiments in space and time and improving the quality of urban construction from the perspective of public emotion and mental health. While youth is a powerful force in urban construction, there are no studies on the relationship between urban youth sentiments and the built environment. With the development of the Internet, social media has provided a large source of data for the metrics of youth sentiment. Based on data from more than 10,000 geolocated Sina Weibo comments posted over one week (from 19 to 25 July 2021) in Shanghai and using a machine learning algorithm for attention mechanism, this study calculates the sentiment label and sentiment intensity of each comment. Ten elements in five aspects were selected to assess the built environment at different scales and also to explore the correlations between built environment elements and sentiment intensity at different scales. The study finds that the overall sentiment of Shanghai youth tends to be negative. Sentiment intensity is significantly associated with most built environment elements at smaller scales. Urban youth have a higher proportion of both happy and sad sentiments, within which sad sentiments are more closely related to the built environment and are significantly related to all built environment elements. This study uses a deep learning algorithm to improve the accuracy of sentiment classification and confirms that the built environment has a great impact on sentiment. This research can help cities develop built environment optimization measures and policies to create positive emotional environments and enhance the well-being of urban youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.