Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457647›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Consumption of Psychiatric Drugs in Primary Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

María Del Carmen González-López, Virginia Díaz-Calvo, Carlos Ruíz-González, Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, Belén Rebollo-Lavado, Tesifón Parrón-Carreño

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effect of age-specific stay-at-home recommendation on healthcare utilization: Evidence from Finland's COVID-19 policy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

María Del Carmen González-LópezPrimary Health Care District of Almeria, Andalusian Health Service, 04006 Almeria, Spain.
Virginia Díaz-CalvoPrimary Health Care District of Almeria, Andalusian Health Service, 04006 Almeria, Spain.
Carlos Ruíz-GonzálezPrimary Health Care District of Almeria, Andalusian Health Service, 04006 Almeria, Spain.
Bruno José Nievas-SorianoDepartment of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04006 Almeria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5917-7404
Belén Rebollo-LavadoNeurology Department, Badajoz Universitary Hospital, 06080 Badajoz, Spain.
Tesifón Parrón-CarreñoDepartment of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04006 Almeria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1951-213X
Andalusian Health Service · ESUniversity of Almería · ESCentro de Implantología Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main objective of this research was to analyze whether there were changes in the use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotic-sedative drugs, in the context of primary health care, during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. We further sought to study consumption in vulnerable population groups.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study was performed in a primary health district of Spain. The data were obtained from the Andalusian Public Health System database, for the pre-COVID-19 period, from March 2019 to February 2020, and for the COVID-19 period, from March 2020 to February 2021. Univariant and bivariant analyses were performed. The effect size was measured using the Rosenthal test.

resultsWhile the total number of medical prescriptions decreased by 2.5% in the COVID-19 period, the prescriptions of psychiatric drugs increased by 6.1%. The increase in the dose consumption per 1000 inhabitants (DHD) was highest for anxiolytics (7.2%), followed by hypnotic-sedatives (5.6%) and antidepressants (3.7%). The consumption of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and sedative-hypnotic drugs was higher in women, older people, and rural areas and lower in areas with social transformation needs, with these differences being statistically significant.

conclusionsThe consumption of psychiatric drugs has increased over the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in women, older people, and rural areas. Thus, we should reflect on the adequate use of these drugs.

Indexed as

Anti-Anxiety AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAgedAntidepressive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesPandemicsPrimary Health CareAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsHypnotics and SedativesantidepressantsanxiolyticsCOVID-19drug consumptiondrug prescriptionhypnotic-sedativesprimary health carepsychiatric drugs

Identifiers

PMID35457647
PMCPMC9030027
OpenAlexW4223941455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.