Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457638›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Exploring the Impact and Path of Environmental Protection Tax on Different Air Pollutant Emissions.

Weijiang Liu, Tingting Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weijiang LiuCenter for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Tingting LiuSchool of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.

Funding

Northeast Revitalization and Development Program of Jilin University No:21dbzx05the Key Research Base project for Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China No.16JJD790015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing studies have examined the double dividend effect of environmental protection tax. However, less attention has been paid to the influencing factors and transmission paths of the pollution abatement effect of the environmental protection tax. Based on the panel data for 30 of China's provinces from 2007 to 2019, this study discusses the environmental protection tax's influencing factors and transmission paths on the emission scale and intensity of different air pollutants through the panel threshold regression model and mediating effect model. The results show that: (1) the environmental protection tax has a positive emission reduction effect on the emission scale or emission intensity of sulfur dioxide (SO

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PollutionSulfur DioxideAir PollutantsSulfur Dioxideenvironmental protection taxmediating effectpollutant emissionsthreshold effect

Identifiers

PMID35457638
PMCPMC9033147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.