Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457633›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Self-Selected Walking Cadence after 16-Week Light-Intensity Physical Activity Intervention for Older Cancer Survivors.

Elizabeth M Harding, Ann L Gibson, Huining Kang, Micah N Zuhl, Harsh Sharma, Cindy K Blair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth M HardingDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Ann L GibsonDepartment of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Huining KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4415-3573
Micah N ZuhlExercise Science Division, School of Health Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859, USA.
Harsh SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Cindy K BlairDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6698-678X

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Improving Physical Functioning in Older Cancer Survivors Through Light-Intensity Physical ActivityK07CA215937 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BLAIR, CINDY KAY · 2018 to 2022
$772k
American Cancer Society IRG-14-187-19NCI NIH HHS CA215937NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800014INCI NIH HHS P30CA118100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this secondary analysis of a light-intensity physical activity intervention, we hypothesized that older cancer survivors would self-select a faster walking cadence to meet their daily step goals. Average steps/day and free-living walking cadence were measured in 41 participants (age 69 ± 3.1 years) with an ActivPAL monitor worn 7 days pre- and post-intervention. Besides peak and average walking cadence, stepping patterns associated with ambulatory intensity were sorted in cadence bands of 20 steps/min from 40−59 (incidental movement) to ≥120 steps/min (fast locomotor movement). Compared to the waitlist Control group (n = 17), the Intervention group (n = 24) increased their peak 30-min cadence (4.3 vs. 1.9 steps/minute; p = 0.03), average 10-min cadence (4.1 vs. −6.6 steps/minute; p = 0.04), and average 30-min cadence (5.7 vs. −0.8 steps/minute, p = 0.03). Steps taken in cadence bands denoting moderate-intensity physical activity (100−119 steps/min) increased by 478 (interquartile range (IQR): −121 to 1844) compared to decreasing by 92 (IQR: −510 to 181) steps/day for the intervention and Control groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Evaluation of free-living walking cadence and patterns of ambulatory behavior can inform future interventions targeting behavior change, especially in those populations most at risk for reduced physical activity and vulnerable to mobility deficits and loss of independence.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAgedExerciseHumansWalkingActivPALaverage cadencecadence bandscancer survivorspeak cadencewearable technology

Identifiers

PMID35457633
PMCPMC9027651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.