Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Measuring Environmental Justice in Real Time: A Pilot Study Using Digital Participatory Method in the Global South, Nepal.

Rehana Shrestha, Klaus Telkmann, Benjamin Schüz, Pramesh Koju, Reshma Shrestha, Biraj Karmacharya, Gabriele Bolte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Digitally supported participation in the nexus between public health and urban planning.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rehana ShresthaLeibniz Science Campus Digital Public Health Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9365-7375
Klaus TelkmannInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8245-8941
Benjamin SchüzLeibniz Science Campus Digital Public Health Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-498X
Pramesh KojuDepartment of Public Health and Community Programs, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-1090-5351
Reshma ShresthaDepartment of Geomatics, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal.
Biraj KarmacharyaDepartment of Public Health and Community Programs, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal.
Gabriele BolteLeibniz Science Campus Digital Public Health Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0269-5059
University of Bremen · DEKathmandu University · NP

Funding

Leibniz Association, the Federal State of Bremen, and the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS. (W4/2018)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals' perceived fairness or justice beliefs are related to health in numerous ways. However, environment justice research to date has given little attention to perceived fairness of environmental exposures as experienced by individuals. This study explored the feasibility of a bottom-up digital participatory (via mobile phones) approach using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to capture individuals' subjective experience of environmental exposures and the subjective evaluation of fairness by those affected in the context of Nepal. In total, 22 individuals participated in the study for 28 days. The results show high rates of study retention and adherence. Individuals' justice perception was found to vary within and between individuals, but also substantially depending on the types of environmental exposures. Nevertheless, the study indicates that uncertainties are inevitable as study design and timing may conflict participants' daily lives and priorities. The method allows us to consider multiple geographic contexts of individuals' everyday lives beyond residential environment. This pilot study proved the possibility to assess perceptions of environmental justice issues and demonstrated the necessary steps to using digital participatory method for assessing subjective perception of fairness of individuals.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentEnvironmental JusticeHumansNepalPilot ProjectsResearch Designecological momentary assessmentenvironmental exposureenvironmental inequalitiesperceived fairnesssmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35457618
PMCPMC9024717
OpenAlexW4223971085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.