Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457577›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Impact of Maternal Prenatal Stress Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic during the First 1000 Days: A Historical Perspective.

Sam Schoenmakers, E J Joanne Verweij, Roseriet Beijers, Hilmar H Bijma, Jasper V Been, Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen, Marion P G Koopmans, Irwin K M Reiss, Eric A P Steegers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 lockdowns affected birthing outcomes in a regional New South Wales Health District.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sam SchoenmakersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E J Joanne VerweijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9343-9957
Roseriet BeijersSocial Development, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-6620
Hilmar H BijmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper V BeenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Régine P M Steegers-TheunissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-5756
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5204-2312
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric A P SteegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact on society, particularly affecting its vulnerable members, including pregnant women and their unborn children. Pregnant mothers reported fear of infection, fear of vertical transmission, fear of poor birth and child outcomes, social isolation, uncertainty about their partner's presence during medical appointments and delivery, increased domestic abuse, and other collateral damage, including vaccine hesitancy. Accordingly, pregnant women's known vulnerability for mental health problems has become a concern during the COVID-19 pandemic, also because of the known effects of prenatal stress for the unborn child. The current narrative review provides a historical overview of transgenerational effects of exposure to disasters during pregnancy, and the role of maternal prenatal stress. We place these effects into the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hereby, we aim to draw attention to the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women of reproductive age (15-49 year) and its potential associated short-term and long-term consequences for the health of children who are conceived, carried, and born during this pandemic. Timely detection and intervention during the first 1000 days is essential to reduce the burden of transgenerational effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansPandemicsParturitionPregnancyPregnant PeopleStress, Psychologicalchild outcomesCOVID-19DOHADfirst 1000 dayshypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axismitigation measurespregnancyprenatal stress

Identifiers

PMID35457577
PMCPMC9029063
OpenAlexW4223916288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.