Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457451›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data Related to Blood Clots and Vaccines.

Wasim Ahmed, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Josep M Vilaseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Mapping the Mpox discourse: A network and sentiment analysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social Media Engagement in Two Governmental Schemes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Macao.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wasim AhmedManagement School, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-1865
Josep Vidal-AlaballHealth Promotion in Rural Areas Research Group, Gerència Territorial de la Catalunya Central, Institut Català de la Salut, 08772 Sant Fruitós de Bages, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3527-4242
Josep M VilasecaFaculty of Medicine, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1577-5728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the first weeks of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, several cases of acute thrombosis were reported. These news reports began to be shared frequently across social media platforms. The aim of this study was to conduct an analysis of Twitter data related to the overall discussion. The data were retrieved from 14 March to 14 April 2021 using the keyword 'blood clots'. A dataset with

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaThrombosisVaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2Social Network AnalysisVaccinesblood clotsclotsCOVID-19social mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID35457451
PMCPMC9025476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.