Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457426›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Plastic Waste Management Strategies and Their Environmental Aspects: A Scientometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review.

Saimin Huang, Hongchang Wang, Waqas Ahmad, Ayaz Ahmad, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed, Ahmed Farouk Deifalla, Imran Mehmood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Supporting plastic waste entrepreneurs in Semarang, Indonesia: Using a personal agency approach.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A comprehensive review of recycling and reusing methods for plastic waste focusing Indian scenario.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saimin HuangCollege of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Hongchang WangCollege of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Waqas AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.
Ayaz AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0312-2965
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195291 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
Abdeliazim Mustafa MohamedDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-5057
Ahmed Farouk DeifallaStructural Engineering Department, Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Future University in Egypt, Cairo 11835, Cairo Governorate, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-1758-3743
Imran MehmoodDepartment of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8313-2564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic consumption increases with the growing population worldwide and results in increased quantities of plastic waste. There are various plastic waste management strategies; however, the present management progress is not sustainable, and plastic waste dumping in landfills is still the most commonly employed strategy. Being nonbiodegradable, plastic waste dumping in landfills creates several environmental and human health problems. Numerous research studies have been conducted recently to determine safe and ecologically beneficial methods of plastic waste handling. This article performed a bibliographic analysis of the available literature on plastic waste management using a computational approach. The highly used keywords, most frequently cited papers and authors, actively participating countries, and sources of publications were analyzed during the bibliographic analysis. In addition, the various plastic waste management strategies and their environmental benefits have been discussed. It has been concluded that among the six plastic waste management techniques (landfills, recycling, pyrolysis, liquefaction, road construction and tar, and concrete production), road construction and tar and concrete production are the two most effective strategies. This is due to significant benefits, such as ease of localization, decreased greenhouse gas emissions, and increased durability and sustainability of manufactured materials, structures, and roadways. Conversely, using landfills is the most undesirable strategy because of the associated environmental and human health concerns. Recycling has equal benefits and drawbacks. In comparison, pyrolysis and liquefaction are favorable due to the production of char and fuel, but high energy requirements limit their benefits. Hence, the use of plastic waste for construction applications is recommended.

Indexed as

PlasticsWaste ManagementHumansPyrolysisRecyclingWaste Disposal FacilitiesPlasticsenvironmental pollutionplastic wasteplastic waste recyclingscientometric analysiswaste management

Identifiers

PMID35457426
PMCPMC9024989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.