Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457379›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Rasch-Validated Italian Scale for Diagnosing Digital Eye Strain: The Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire IT©.

Natalia Cantó-Sancho, Elena Ronda, Julio Cabrero-García, Stefano Casati, Angela Carta, Stefano Porru, Mar Seguí-Crespo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of binocular vision parameters as screening indicators for asthenopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Digital Eye Strain- A Comprehensive Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia Cantó-SanchoDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-9685
Elena RondaPublic Health Research Group, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-466X
Julio Cabrero-GarcíaDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4452-635X
Stefano CasatiEye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2558-0756
Angela CartaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-8765
Stefano PorruDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Mar Seguí-CrespoDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.
University of Alicante · ESUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of digital devices affects eye health; this can influence the performance of workers. To assess this impact, validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires are needed. The purpose of this study was to validate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q©) using Rasch analysis. Two hundred and forty-one Italian workers completed an ad hoc questionnaire on anamnesis and exposure to digital devices, and the Italian version of the CVS-Q©. Subsequently, a battery involving three clinical ocular surface and tear tests was performed. The reliability and validity of the scale was assessed using the Andrich Rating Scale Model, and the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) was calculated. A good fit of both items and persons to the predictions of the Rasch model was observed, with acceptable reliability, unidimensionality, and no or minimal severe differences as a function of gender or age; moreover, good test-retest repeatability, adequate values of sensitivity, reliability, and area under the curve, and adequate construct validity based on clinical tests were obtained. Workers with a questionnaire score ≥ 7 were found to present with CVS. The prevalence of CVS was 76.6%. The CVS-Q IT© is a valid and reliable scale to assess CVS in Italian workers who use digital devices.

Indexed as

AsthenopiaComputersHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSyndromeasthenopiapsychometricsRasch modelsurveys and questionnairesvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID35457379
PMCPMC9028942
OpenAlexW4224213189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.