Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457101›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Liquid Biopsy as a Source of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Management of Lynch Syndrome.

Gergely Buglyó, Jakub Styk, Ondrej Pös, Ádám Csók, Vanda Repiska, Beáta Soltész, Tomas Szemes, Bálint Nagy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A novel frameshift variant inFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gergely BuglyóDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5994-2658
Jakub StykInstitute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 811 08 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-3522
Ondrej PösComenius University Science Park, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2491-2285
Ádám CsókDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Vanda RepiskaInstitute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 811 08 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Beáta SoltészDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Tomas SzemesComenius University Science Park, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Bálint NagyDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0295-185X
University of Debrecen · HUGeneton (Slovakia) · SKComenius University Bratislava · SK

Funding

European Regional Development Fund ITMS: 313011V578Slovak Academy of Sciences VEGA 1/0305/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited cancer predisposition disorder, which may manifest as colorectal cancer (CRC), endometrial cancer (EC) or other malignancies of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract as well as the skin and brain. Its genetic cause is a defect in one of the four key DNA mismatch repair (MMR) loci. Testing of patients at risk is currently based on the absence of MMR protein staining and detection of mutations in cancer tissue and the germline, microsatellite instability (MSI) and the hypermethylated state of the MLH1 promoter. If LS is shown to have caused CRC, lifetime follow-up with regular screening (most importantly, colonoscopy) is required. In recent years, DNA and RNA markers extracted from liquid biopsies have found some use in the clinical diagnosis of LS. They have the potential to greatly enhance the efficiency of the follow-up process by making it minimally invasive, reproducible, and time effective. Here, we review markers reported in the literature and their current clinical applications, and we comment on possible future directions.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEndometrial NeoplasmsNucleic AcidsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansLiquid BiopsyMicrosatellite InstabilityBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorNucleic Acidsbiomarkercirculating nucleic acidscolorectal cancerliquid biopsylynch syndromescreening

Identifiers

PMID35457101
PMCPMC9029375
OpenAlexW4223963538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.