Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457080›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

TransPhos: A Deep-Learning Model for General Phosphorylation Site Prediction Based on Transformer-Encoder Architecture.

Xun Wang, Zhiyuan Zhang, Chaogang Zhang, Xiangyu Meng, Xin Shi, Peng Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xun WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-433X
Zhiyuan ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7652-4375
Chaogang ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China.
Xiangyu MengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-3090
Xin ShiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China.
Peng QuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61873280National Natural Science Foundation of China 61873281National Natural Science Foundation of China 61972416Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2019MF012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is one of the most critical post-translational modifications of proteins in eukaryotes, which is essential for a variety of biological processes. Plenty of attempts have been made to improve the performance of computational predictors for phosphorylation site prediction. However, most of them are based on extra domain knowledge or feature selection. In this article, we present a novel deep learning-based predictor, named TransPhos, which is constructed using a transformer encoder and densely connected convolutional neural network blocks, for predicting phosphorylation sites. Data experiments are conducted on the datasets of PPA (version 3.0) and Phospho. ELM. The experimental results show that our TransPhos performs better than several deep learning models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long-term and short-term memory networks (LSTM), Recurrent neural networks (RNN) and Fully connected neural networks (FCNN), and some state-of-the-art deep learning-based prediction tools, including GPS2.1, NetPhos, PPRED, Musite, PhosphoSVM, SKIPHOS, and DeepPhos. Our model achieves a good performance on the training datasets of Serine (S), Threonine (T), and Tyrosine (Y), with AUC values of 0.8579, 0.8335, and 0.6953 using 10-fold cross-validation tests, respectively, and demonstrates that the presented TransPhos tool considerably outperforms competing predictors in general protein phosphorylation site prediction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsProteinsphosphorylation site predictionpost-translational modificationstransformer

Identifiers

PMID35457080
PMCPMC9029334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.