ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of Housekeeping Genes for Normalizing RNA Expression in Real-Time PCR in Tuberculomas and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Membrane Palmitoylated Protein 7 is Required for Osteogenesis and is Linked with Bone Mineralization and Osteoporosis: The Functional Evaluation of GEFOS GWAS Hit.Calcified tissue international · 2025Article
- Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) enhances mitochondrial energy production in NARP cybrids.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparative assessment of reference genes in mouse brown adipocyte differentiation and thermogenesis in vitro.Adipocyte · 2024Article
- RPLP0/TBP are the most stable reference genes for human dental pulp stem cells under osteogenic differentiation.World journal of stem cells · 2024Article
- Assessment of Reference Genes Stability in Cortical Bone of Obese and Diabetic Mice.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Bone Development and Regeneration 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Selection of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in developing chicken embryonic ovary.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RT-qPCR is the gold standard and the most commonly used method for measuring gene expression. Selection of appropriate reference gene(s) for normalization is a crucial part of RT-qPCR experimental design, which allows accurate quantification and reliability of the results. Because there is no universal reference gene and even commonly used housekeeping genes' expression can vary under certain conditions, careful selection of an appropriate internal control must be performed for each cell type or tissue and experimental design. The aim of this study was to identify the most stable reference genes during osteogenic differentiation of the human osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63, HOS, and SaOS-2 using the geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper statistical algorithms. Our results show that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.