Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35457068›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Are We Studying Non-Coding RNAs Correctly? Lessons from nc886.

Yong Sun Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide (HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Non-coding 886 (Epigenetics · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. AbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Emerging roles of tRNA-derived small RNAs in cancer biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. RNA Regulatory Networks 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yong Sun LeeDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-3410

Funding

National Cancer Center NCC-2110191National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1A2C2088108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNAs or long ncRNAs, have brought about a new paradigm in the regulation of gene expression. Sequencing technologies have detected transcripts with tremendous sensitivity and throughput and revealed that the majority of them lack protein-coding potential. Myriad articles have investigated numerous ncRNAs and many of them claim that ncRNAs play gene-regulatory roles. However, it is questionable whether all these articles draw conclusions through cautious gain- and loss-of function experiments whose design was reasonably based on an ncRNA's correct identity and features. In this review, these issues are discussed with a regulatory ncRNA, nc886, as an example case to represent cautions and guidelines when studying ncRNAs.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingGene Expression RegulationRNA, UntranslatedMicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Untranslatedassayknockdownnc886non-coding RNAoverexpression

Identifiers

PMID35457068
PMCPMC9027504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.