Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456985›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Theophylline: Old Drug in a New Light, Application in COVID-19 through Computational Studies.

Luis M Montaño, Bettina Sommer, Juan C Gomez-Verjan, Genaro S Morales-Paoli, Gema Lizbeth Ramírez-Salinas, Héctor Solís-Chagoyán, Zuly A Sanchez-Florentino, Eduardo Calixto, Gloria E Pérez-Figueroa, Rohan Carter and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of fasting and inflammatory challenges on the swine hepatic metabolome.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part D, Genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Potential hepatoprotective effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Luis M MontañoDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, CP, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-1298
Bettina SommerLaboratorio de Hiperreactividad Bronquial, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosío Villegas", Ciudad de México 14080, CP, Mexico.
Juan C Gomez-VerjanDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, Ciudad de México 10200, CP, Mexico.
Genaro S Morales-PaoliDirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Geriatría, Ciudad de México 10200, CP, Mexico.
Gema Lizbeth Ramírez-SalinasLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón S/N, Col. Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, CP, Mexico.
Héctor Solís-ChagoyánLaboratorio de Neurofarmacología, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría "Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz", Ciudad de México 14370, CP, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0692-6931
Zuly A Sanchez-FlorentinoLaboratorio de Neurofarmacología, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría "Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz", Ciudad de México 14370, CP, Mexico.
Eduardo CalixtoDepartamento de Neurobiología, Dirección de Investigación en Neurociencias, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría "Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz", Ciudad de México 14370, CP, Mexico.
Gloria E Pérez-FigueroaInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Unidad Periférica en el Estudio de la Neuroinflamación en Patologías Neurológicas, Ciudad de México 06720, CP, Mexico.
Rohan CarterFRACGP/MBBS, Murchison Outreach Service Mount Magnet Western Australia, Mount Magnet, WA 6530, Australia.
Ruth Jaimez-MelgozaDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, CP, Mexico.
Bianca S Romero-MartínezDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, CP, Mexico.
Edgar Flores-SotoDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, CP, Mexico.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz · MXInstituto Nacional de Pediatria · MXHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 137725National Autonomous University of Mexico IN200522National Autonomous University of Mexico IN204319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theophylline (3-methyxanthine) is a historically prominent drug used to treat respiratory diseases, alone or in combination with other drugs. The rapid onset of the COVID-19 pandemic urged the development of effective pharmacological treatments to directly attack the development of new variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and possess a therapeutical battery of compounds that could improve the current management of the disease worldwide. In this context, theophylline, through bronchodilatory, immunomodulatory, and potentially antiviral mechanisms, is an interesting proposal as an adjuvant in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Nevertheless, it is essential to understand how this compound could behave against such a disease, not only at a pharmacodynamic but also at a pharmacokinetic level. In this sense, the quickest approach in drug discovery is through different computational methods, either from network pharmacology or from quantitative systems pharmacology approaches. In the present review, we explore the possibility of using theophylline in the treatment of COVID-19 patients since it seems to be a relevant candidate by aiming at several immunological targets involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. Theophylline down-regulates the inflammatory processes activated by SARS-CoV-2 through various mechanisms, and herein, they are discussed by reviewing computational simulation studies and their different applications and effects.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2TheophyllineAntiviral AgentsTheophyllineantiviral activityCOVID-19immunomodulatory effectsmolecular dockingnetwork pharmacologyquantitative systems pharmacologySARS-CoV-2theophylline

Identifiers

PMID35456985
PMCPMC9030606
OpenAlexW4223504865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.