Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456828›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Surfactin Shows Relatively Low Antimicrobial Activity against

Lars Lilge, Nadine Ersig, Philipp Hubel, Moritz Aschern, Evelina Pillai, Peter Klausmann, Jens Pfannstiel, Marius Henkel, Kambiz Morabbi Heravi, Rudolf Hausmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potato (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Improving Surfactin Production inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Characterization ofantifungal properties of lipopeptide-producingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Evaluation of an external foam column forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  16. Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lars LilgeDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7693-477X
Nadine ErsigDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Philipp HubelCore Facility Hohenheim, Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, University of Hohenheim, Ottilie-Zeller-Weg 2, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Moritz AschernDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Evelina PillaiCore Facility Hohenheim (640), Data Management & Bioinformatics, University of Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-0835
Peter KlausmannDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Jens PfannstielCore Facility Hohenheim, Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, University of Hohenheim, Ottilie-Zeller-Weg 2, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Marius HenkelDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5343-9661
Kambiz Morabbi HeraviDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Rudolf HausmannDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology (150), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
University of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 398354917Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 36/171-1 FUGG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surfactin is described as a powerful biosurfactant and is natively produced by Bacillus subtilis in notable quantities. Among other industrially relevant characteristics, antimicrobial properties have been attributed to surfactin-producing Bacillus isolates. To investigate this property, stress approaches were carried out with biotechnologically established strains of Corynebacterium glutamicum, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida with the highest possible amounts of surfactin. Contrary to the popular opinion, the highest growth-reducing effects were detectable in B. subtilis and E. coli after surfactin treatment of 100 g/L with 35 and 33%, respectively, while P. putida showed no growth-specific response. In contrast, other antimicrobial biosurfactants, like rhamnolipids and sophorolipids, showed significantly stronger effects on bacterial growth. Since the addition of high amounts of surfactin in defined mineral salt medium reduced the cell growth of B. subtilis by about 40%, the initial stress response at the protein level was analyzed by mass spectrometry, showing induction of stress proteins under control of alternative sigma factors σB and σW as well as the activation of LiaRS two-component system. Overall, although surfactin is associated with antimicrobial properties, relatively low growth-reducing effects could be demonstrated after the surfactin addition, challenging the general claim of the antimicrobial properties of surfactin.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisbiosurfactantssecondary metabolitesstress responsesurfactin

Identifiers

PMID35456828
PMCPMC9030240
OpenAlexW4224324381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.