ArticleMicroorganisms2022
Bacterial Communities of Forest Soils along Different Elevations: Diversity, Structure, and Functional Composition with Potential Impacts on CO
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tree diversity shapes soil bacterial community structure under low abiotic heterogeneity in the Atlantic forest.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Deciphering the Effects of Phosphate Fertiliser on Rhizospheric Bacterial Community Structure and Potato Common Scab.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Diversity of bacterial communities in wetlands of Calakmul Biosphere Reserve: a comparative analysis between conserved and semi-urbanized zones in pre-Mayan Train era.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Microbial communities in the phyllosphere and endosphere of Norway spruce under attack byFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Exploring soil bacterial and fungal communities in Colombian terrestrial ecosystems modulated by altitude-influenced factors.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Soil bacteria are important components of forest ecosystems, there compostion structure and functions are sensitive to environmental conditions along elevation gradients. Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing followed by FAPROTAX function prediction, we examined the diversity, composition, and functional potentials of soil bacterial communities at three sites at elevations of 1400 m, 1600 m, and 2200 m in a temperate forest. We showed that microbial taxonomic composition did not change with elevation (p = 0.311), though soil bacterial α-diversities did. Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia were abundant phyla in almost all soil samples, while Nitrospirae, closely associated with soil nitrogen cycling, was the fourth most abundant phylum in soils at 2200 m. Chemoheterotrophy and aerobic chemoheterotrophy were the two most abundant functions performed in soils at 1400 m and 1600 m, while nitrification (25.59% on average) and aerobic nitrite oxidation (19.38% on average) were higher in soils at 2200 m. Soil CO2 effluxes decreased (p < 0.050) with increasing elevation, while they were positively correlated (r = 0.55, p = 0.035) with the abundances of bacterial functional groups associated with carbon degradation. Moreover, bacterial functional composition, rather than taxonomic composition, was significantly associated with soil CO2 effluxes, suggesting a decoupling of taxonomy and function, with the latter being a better predictor of ecosystem functions. Annual temperature, annual precipitation, and pH shaped (p < 0.050) both bacterial taxonomic and functional communities. By establishing linkages between bacterial taxonomic communities, abundances of bacterial functional groups, and soil CO2 fluxes, we provide novel insights into how soil bacterial communities could serve as potential proxies of ecosystem functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.