ArticleMicroorganisms2022
Dynamic Microstructure Assembly Driven by
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Community Restructuring Enhances Composting Efficiency: Synergistic Roles of Thermal Cycling and Fungal Inoculants (Fomes lignosus and Penicillium glabrum) in Metabolic Adaptation.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Role of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in the removal of odorous gases by the use of plastic recycling waste as a biofilter.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Harnessing the potential of exogenous microbial agents: a comprehensive review on enhancing lignocellulose degradation in agricultural waste composting.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Dynamic changes in and correlations between microbial communities and physicochemical properties during the composting of cattle manure with Penicillium oxalicum.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Special Issue "Biodegradation and Environmental Microbiomes": Editorial.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- The Succession of the Cellulolytic Microbial Community from the Soil during Oat Straw Decomposition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of Lysinibacillus sp. LF-N1 and Penicillium oxalicum DH-1 inoculants (LFPO group) on compost succession and the microbial dynamic structure of co-composting wheat straw and cow manure composting were investigated. The inoculants contributed to longer thermophilic stages, higher temperatures (62.8 °C) and lower microbial diversity in the LFPO treatment compared to the control group (CK). Moreover, LFPO inoculation increased the germination index and accelerated organic matter and lignocellulose degradation in the compost. Microbial analysis confirmed that the inoculants effectively altered the microbial communities. The predominant biomarkers for bacteria and fungi in inoculated compost were members of Lysinibacillus and Penicillium, respectively. Functional prediction showed greater lignocellulose degradation and less pathogen accumulation in the LFPO group. The cooccurrence network analysis showed that the network structure in LFPO compost was greatly simplified compared to that in CK. Bacterial cluster A was dominated by Lysinibacillus, and fungal cluster B was represented by Penicillium, which were significantly correlated with temperature and lignocellulose degradation, respectively (p < 0.05). These results demonstrated that the LF-N1 and DH-1 inoculants drove the bacterial and fungal assemblies to induce physicochemical property changes during cocomposting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.