Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456756›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Predominance of Other Pathogenic Bacteria among Presumptive Tuberculosis Cases Attending Tuberculosis Clinics in Mwanza, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Laboratory-Based Study.

Florencia S Buchera, Vitus Silago, Geofrey Japhet, Conjester I Mtemisika, Prisca Damiano, Helmut A Nyawale, Martha F Mushi, Mariam M Mirambo, Jeremiah Seni, Stephen E Mshana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florencia S BucheraDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.
Vitus SilagoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-4178-3254
Geofrey JaphetTuberculosis Section, Central Pathology Laboratory, Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza 1370, Tanzania.
Conjester I MtemisikaCentral Pathology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology, Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza 1370, Tanzania.
Prisca DamianoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.
Helmut A NyawaleDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.
Martha F MushiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-3511-2523
Mariam M MiramboDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-3079
Jeremiah SeniDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-2420-5329
Stephen E MshanaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 1464, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-7526-6271
Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZBugando Medical Centre · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the prevalence and co-infection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other pathogenic bacteria among presumptive cases of tuberculosis (TB) at selected hospitals in Mwanza, Tanzania. GeneXpert and conventional bacteriological culture and sensitivity were used for the detection of TB and other pathogenic bacteria, respectively. STATA version 13.0 was used for data analysis. The median (IQR) age of participants was 33 (19−51) years with males forming more than half (i.e., 59% (158/264)) of the participants. Microscopically, 29.5% (78/264) of the patients had polymorphonuclear leucocytes in the sputum samples. Approximately 7.2% (19/264), 16.3% (43/264), and 1.1% (3/264) of participants had TB, other pathogenic bacteria, and co-infections, respectively. One sample had growth of two other bacteria, resulting in a total of 44 isolated bacteria with the predominance of Gram-negative bacteria at 75.0% (33/44). The predominant species isolated was the Klebsiella pneumoniae complex at 52.3% (23/44). Overall, 27.3% (9/33) of GNB were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, while Gram-positive bacteria were more resistant to erythromycin at 63.6% (7/11). Good quality sputa had a significantly higher yield of pathogenic bacteria than poor quality sputa (37.2% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001). Presumptive TB cases were predominantly infected with other pathogenic bacteria than M. tuberculosis. Therefore, other pathogenic bacteria should be considered when attending presumptive TB cases to ensure favorable treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

co-infectionsMwanzaMycobacterium tuberculosis complexother pathogenic bacteriatuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35456756
PMCPMC9025500
OpenAlexW4220859675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.