ArticleMicroorganisms2022
Comparison of Syngas-Fermenting
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Careful CO Addition Enhances Autotrophic d-Lactate Formation With EngineeredEngineering in life sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Syngas Fermentation for Recovery of High-Value Resources: A Comprehensive Review.Current pollution reports · 2025Review
- Understanding microbial syngas fermentation rates.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Thermophilic Moorella thermoacetica as a platform microorganism for C1 gas utilization: physiology, engineering, and applications.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2023Review
- Enzyme-constrained metabolic model andComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, syngas fermentation has emerged as a promising means for the production of fuels and platform chemicals, with a variety of acetogens efficiently converting CO-rich gases to ethanol. However, the feasibility of syngas fermentation processes is related to the occurrence of syngas impurities such as NH3, H2S, and NOX. Therefore, the effects of defined additions of NH4+, H2S, and NO3− were studied in autotrophic batch processes with C. autoethanogenum, C. ljungdahlii, and C. ragsdalei while applying continuously gassed stirred-tank bioreactors. Any initial addition of ammonium and nitrate curbed the cell growth of the Clostridia being studied and reduced the final alcohol concentrations. C. ljungdahlii showed the highest tolerance to ammonium and nitrate, whereas C. ragsdalei was even positively influenced by the presence of 0.1 g L−1 H2S. Quantitative goals for the purification of syngas were identified for each of the acetogens studied in the used experimental setup. Syngas purification should in particular focus on the NOX impurities that caused the highest inhibiting effect and maintain the concentrations of NH3 and H2S within an acceptable range (e.g., NH3 < 4560 ppm and H2S < 108 ppm) in order to avoid inhibition through the accumulation of these impurities in the bioreactor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.